• 💖 [Donate To Keep MyPTSD Online] 💖 Every contribution, no matter how small, fuels our mission and helps us continue to provide peer-to-peer services. Your generosity keeps us independent and available freely to the world. MyPTSD closes if we can't reach our annual goal.

how to stave off flashback

How to distinguish whether it's emdr or CBT which is destabilizing you?
Distinguishing whether Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is destabilizing you can involve reflection on your experiences, symptoms, and responses to each therapy modality. Here are some considerations to help differentiate between the effects of EMDR and CBT on your mental health:

1. Timing of distress: Pay attention to when you experience increased distress or destabilization during or after therapy sessions. If you notice a pattern of heightened emotional reactivity, triggers, or intrusive thoughts following EMDR sessions specifically, it may suggest that EMDR is contributing to destabilization.

2. Themes of distress: Consider the content and themes of your distressing experiences or symptoms during and between EMDR and CBT sessions. If the distress aligns more closely with the targeted traumatic memories or processing in EMDR, it may indicate that EMDR is playing a role in destabilization.

3. Response to therapy techniques: Reflect on how you respond to the specific techniques used in EMDR and CBT. If you find that the processing of traumatic memories, bilateral stimulation, or rapid desensitization in EMDR triggers intense emotional responses or exacerbates distress, it could suggest EMDR-related destabilization.

4. Coping strategies effectiveness: Evaluate the effectiveness of coping strategies and skills learned in both EMDR and CBT in managing distress and stabilizing your emotions. If you find that CBT strategies, such as cognitive restructuring or behavioral interventions, are more helpful in regulating your emotions and coping with triggers, it may point to EMDR as a destabilizing factor.

5. Therapist communication: Discuss your experiences of destabilization with your therapists in both EMDR and CBT. They can provide insights into how each therapy modality may be influencing your emotional well-being and collaborate on adjusting the treatment approach to better support you.

6. Overall treatment progress: Assess your overall progress and improvements in symptoms over time in both EMDR and CBT. If you notice persistent or escalating destabilization without significant gains in symptom reduction or functional improvement, it may indicate the need to reassess the suitability of the therapeutic approach.

It is essential to communicate openly with your therapists and express any concerns or uncertainties about the impact of EMDR and CBT on your mental health. Your therapists can work together to coordinate care, address potential destabilization factors, and tailor interventions to promote your safety and well-being throughout the therapeutic process. Trusting your instincts, seeking support when needed, and prioritizing your emotional stability are crucial in navigating the complexities of trauma therapy effectively.
is emdr or cbt usually more destabilizing?
The potential for destabilization in therapy can vary greatly depending on individual differences, trauma history, coping strategies, and the therapeutic approach used. Both Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) can have different effects on individuals' emotional well-being and stability. Here are some considerations regarding the potential for destabilization in EMDR and CBT:

1. EMDR: EMDR involves the processing of traumatic memories and emotions through bilateral stimulation, leading to the desensitization of distressing experiences. For some individuals, revisiting traumatic memories and engaging in rapid processing can trigger intense emotional reactions, flashbacks, and temporary destabilization. The nature of EMDR can make it more likely to evoke strong emotional responses during processing sessions.

2. CBT: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy focuses on identifying and challenging negative thought patterns, beliefs, and behaviors that contribute to distress. While CBT is generally considered less likely to trigger intense emotional reactions compared to EMDR, exploring deep-rooted beliefs, facing fears, and working through avoidance behaviors can still evoke discomfort and temporary destabilization as individuals confront challenging thoughts and emotions.

It is essential to recognize that feelings of destabilization can be a natural part of the therapeutic process, particularly when addressing traumatic experiences or deeply ingrained maladaptive patterns. Your therapists can provide support, guidance, and coping strategies to help you navigate periods of increased distress and manage emotional fluctuations during therapy sessions.

The likelihood of destabilization in EMDR or CBT may also depend on factors such as the therapist's expertise, your readiness for therapy, the complexity of your trauma history, and the presence of additional mental health concerns. Open communication with your therapists about your experiences, concerns, and responses to therapy can help tailor treatment approaches to support your emotional well-being and minimize the risk of destabilization.

Ultimately, the impact of EMDR and CBT on destabilization is individualized, and what may be destabilizing for one person could be beneficial for another. It is important to prioritize your emotional safety, communicate openly with your therapists, and collaborate on developing a treatment plan that best supports your healing and recovery journey.
is it ever beneficial to feel steamrolled by a therapist?
Feeling "steamrolled" by a therapist, where you experience being overwhelmed, invalidated, or disregarded in therapy, is typically not considered beneficial or conducive to therapeutic progress. Therapy is ideally a collaborative and supportive process where your thoughts, feelings, and experiences are acknowledged, respected, and explored in a safe and empowering environment.

Here are some considerations regarding feeling steamrolled by a therapist:

1. Trust and rapport: A strong therapeutic alliance built on trust, respect, and open communication is essential for effective therapy. If you feel consistently overpowered or dismissed by a therapist, it can erode trust, hinder your ability to engage in therapy authentically, and impede the therapeutic relationship.

2. Empowerment and autonomy: Therapy should empower you to explore your experiences, insights, and goals at your own pace and in a way that respects your autonomy. Feeling steamrolled can diminish your sense of agency, self-efficacy, and ownership over your therapeutic journey, potentially leading to disengagement or resistance to therapy.

3. Emotional safety: Feeling overwhelmed or invalidated in therapy can trigger emotional distress, exacerbate feelings of vulnerability, and potentially retraumatize individuals with complex trauma histories. A therapist should create a safe space for you to navigate challenging emotions, explore vulnerabilities, and process experiences with sensitivity and validation.

4. Collaboration and feedback: Open communication with your therapist about your experiences, concerns, and boundaries is crucial in fostering a collaborative therapeutic relationship. If you feel steamrolled, it is important to assert your needs, provide feedback on your experiences in therapy, and work together to address any dynamics that may be hindering your progress.

5. Therapeutic approach: Different therapy modalities and styles may vary in their intensity, directiveness, and approaches to addressing resistance or defense mechanisms. It is essential to find a therapist whose therapeutic approach aligns with your preferences, personality, and therapeutic goals to ensure a productive and supportive therapeutic experience.

If you find yourself feeling steamrolled by a therapist, it is important to address these concerns directly with your therapist or consider seeking a second opinion from another mental health professional. Your emotional well-being, sense of agency, and comfort in therapy are paramount in facilitating a positive and effective therapeutic process. Trust your instincts, advocate for your needs, and prioritize a therapeutic relationship that promotes collaboration, respect, and safety.
what are some problems with using CBT for complex trauma?
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a widely used and evidence-based therapeutic approach for various mental health concerns, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and specific trauma-related symptoms. However, when working with individuals who have experienced complex trauma, which typically involves exposure to multiple traumatic events over an extended period, there are some specific challenges and limitations to consider when using CBT. Some problems with using CBT for complex trauma may include:

1. **Limited focus on interpersonal dynamics**: CBT primarily emphasizes cognitive restructuring and behavior modification, often overlooking the significant impact of complex relational dynamics and attachment disruptions in complex trauma. Addressing interpersonal issues, trust, boundaries, and relational patterns may require a more comprehensive and nuanced approach tailored to the complexities of complex trauma.

2. **Reprocessing traumatic memories**: CBT techniques such as exposure therapy may be challenging for individuals with complex trauma due to the high level of distress and dissociation that can be triggered when revisiting numerous traumatic events. Processing multiple trauma memories in a linear or sequential manner without addressing underlying relational and attachment wounds may lead to retraumatization or ineffectiveness in symptom reduction.

3. **Avoidance and numbing**: Individuals with complex trauma often develop intricate coping mechanisms, including avoidance, dissociation, and emotional numbing, to manage overwhelming distress and maintain a sense of safety. Traditional CBT interventions focusing on symptom reduction may overlook the underlying function of these coping strategies and the need for skillful navigation of avoidance patterns in the context of complex trauma.

4. **Safety and stabilization**: Establishing a foundation of safety, emotional regulation, and stabilization is crucial before engaging in trauma-focused interventions in individuals with complex trauma. Rushing into exposure-based techniques without adequately addressing safety concerns, grounding skills, and distress tolerance may heighten vulnerability, exacerbate symptoms, and compromise therapeutic progress.

5. **Integration of the self**: Complex trauma can fragment an individual's sense of self, leading to identity disturbances, self-blame, and internalized beliefs of worthlessness or shame. CBT's emphasis on cognitive restructuring may not always address the deeper wounds related to identity development, self-compassion, and the integration of fragmented aspects of the self that are common in complex trauma presentations.

To effectively address the unique challenges of complex trauma within a CBT framework, therapists may need to adapt and supplement traditional CBT techniques with trauma-informed approaches, attachment-based interventions, somatic experiencing, emotion-focused therapy, or dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) to cultivate a more comprehensive and holistic treatment plan. Collaboration with a skilled trauma therapist who integrates diverse modalities and tailors interventions to the individual's complex trauma history is essential in navigating the complexities and promoting healing in the context of complex trauma.
is CBT less effective for marginalized people?
The effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for marginalized individuals can be influenced by various factors related to identity, social determinants of health, cultural considerations, access to care, and the intersection of systemic oppression and mental health disparities. While CBT has demonstrated efficacy across a range of mental health conditions, including anxiety disorders, depression, and PTSD, its applicability and effectiveness for marginalized populations may be impacted by the following considerations:

1. **Cultural relevance**: Traditional CBT approaches may not always adequately address the diverse cultural backgrounds, belief systems, values, and contextual factors that shape the experiences of marginalized individuals. The lack of cultural sensitivity in therapy can hinder engagement, rapport-building, and the applicability of CBT techniques in addressing the unique stressors and coping strategies within marginalized communities.

2. **Social context**: Marginalized populations often face systemic barriers, such as poverty, discrimination, racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and lack of access to resources, which can exacerbate mental health symptoms and contribute to treatment disparities. Addressing the socio-political context and advocating for social justice within therapy may be essential in supporting the well-being of marginalized individuals and enhancing the effectiveness of CBT interventions.

3. **Trust and rapport**: Building trust and establishing a therapeutic alliance is crucial for the success of any therapeutic approach, including CBT. Marginalized individuals may have valid concerns about being pathologized, misunderstood, or retraumatized within mental health settings, impacting their willingness to engage in therapy and benefit from CBT interventions.

4. **Intersectional identities**: Marginalized individuals may hold intersecting identities that contribute to complex experiences of discrimination, microaggressions, and multi-layered forms of trauma. Traditional CBT interventions may overlook the intersectionality of identities and fail to address the unique challenges faced by individuals at the intersections of marginalization, such as LGBTQ+ people of color or disabled individuals from low-income backgrounds.

5. **Power dynamics**: Therapeutic power differentials between the therapist and client can be accentuated in contexts of marginalization, where traditional models of therapy may perpetuate paternalistic or oppressive dynamics. Empowering marginalized individuals to voice their experiences, preferences, and needs within therapy is essential in promoting agency, self-advocacy, and collaborative goal setting in CBT.

To enhance the effectiveness of CBT for marginalized individuals, therapists can prioritize cultural humility, diversity competence, social justice advocacy, trauma-informed care, and a strengths-based approach that validates lived experiences and honors the resilience of individuals from marginalized communities. Integrating culturally responsive CBT adaptations, collaborating with community resources, and centering the client's unique identities and narratives can help bridge the gaps in mental health care for marginalized populations and promote more inclusive and equitable treatment outcomes.
is child abuse rare?
Child abuse is unfortunately not rare and remains a significant public health concern affecting individuals across various age groups, socioeconomic backgrounds, and cultural contexts. The prevalence and impact of child abuse can vary depending on the type of abuse (physical, sexual, emotional, neglect) and the reporting mechanisms within different communities and countries. Here are some key points to consider regarding the prevalence of child abuse:

1. **Global statistics**: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), an estimated 1 billion children experience physical, sexual, or emotional abuse, neglect, exploitation, or domestic violence globally each year. Child abuse transcends geographical boundaries and is a widespread issue with profound implications for the well-being and development of children.

2. **Underreporting**: Child abuse is often underreported due to factors such as fear of retaliation, shame, stigma, lack of awareness about available resources, mistrust of authorities, and normalization of abusive behaviors within families or communities. The hidden nature of child abuse can contribute to underestimations of prevalence rates and challenges in identifying and addressing cases of abuse.

3. **Long-term consequences**: Children who experience abuse are at increased risk of developing physical health problems, mental health disorders (such as PTSD, depression, anxiety), substance abuse, interpersonal difficulties, academic challenges, and self-destructive behaviors throughout their lives. The impact of childhood trauma can be enduring and may affect multiple domains of functioning across the lifespan.

4. **Intersections with societal factors**: Child abuse often intersects with systemic issues such as poverty, inequality, lack of social support, inadequate access to mental health services, and cultural norms that perpetuate harmful practices. Addressing the root causes of child abuse requires a multi-faceted approach that considers the complex interplay of individual, family, community, and societal factors influencing the prevalence and perpetuation of abuse.

5. **Preventive measures**: Prevention efforts, early intervention programs, trauma-informed care, mandatory reporting laws, public awareness campaigns, and support services for families and children are crucial in addressing child abuse and promoting child safety and well-being. Collaborative efforts among healthcare professionals, educators, social workers, law enforcement agencies, policymakers, and community organizations are essential in creating a protective environment for children and preventing the occurrence of abuse.

While child abuse remains a prevalent and distressing issue, it is important to recognize that interventions can make a significant difference in breaking the cycle of abuse, supporting survivors, and promoting healing and resilience in individuals who have experienced childhood trauma. If you or someone you know is experiencing or has experienced child abuse, it is essential to seek support from trusted professionals, helplines, or community resources to ensure safety, validation, and appropriate intervention.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.