I’ve always interpreted fawning to be behaviour directed towards the aggressor. But very definitely, it’s a conflict
avoidance strategy.
Which this isn’t. Quite the opposite, it’s a bit like grabbing the conflict (one person’s issues with your dogs), and running through the neighbourhood with it setting a whole heap of potential
new fires, with
other neighbours.
Over-compensating, as a coping strategy, does sound closer to me. Which is super dooper common with dysfunctional schemas like “I am unworthy”.
I went back and recanvassed my own nieborhhood. I found myself asking everyone within 3 houses if my dogs bothered them. If my dogs intimidated them. If my nice guy personality intimidated them.
Here’s the thing, that last question? Is a no-win scenario. Best answer is “No, your nice guy personality doesn’t intimidate me”. But, that’s hardly a compliment. That question sets you up to receive a negative response either way. Which, yeah, leads you to wonder:
I still am not sure what I was asking.
What if you think about this the other way round. What responses were you hoping to get? What responses would have felt good?
If you can figure out what
responses you were hoping for, then it may be easier to figure out what you
really wanted to ask.
If there wasn’t
any response that would have felt good? That’s crazy helpful to know. Because that’s straight up self-sabotage.
Punishing ourselves when we feel unworthy. Omg if I had a dollar for every member here who did
that from time to time! (Me included)
Why did I risk my relationship with nieghbors by asking such uncomfortable questions? Why couldn't I stop? Why did I recieve nothing but positive feedback and still feel invalidated?
Because a damaged sense of self worth is a much bigger beast than anything the neighbours from hell can throw at us. No amount of ‘validation’ from others is gonna fix it. The validation, ultimately, for our own self worth, needs to come from ourselves.