Welcome
@GLB :)
I have many of the same questions. Sounds like about the same age but...
Thank you for your response, and I hope you are able to get accepted into the program you desire. It is indeed challenging for nontraditional students, veterans, and those with disabilities. There's a cap on veteran's benefits (I'm a veteran, by the way, but my PTSD and DID stemmed from childhood abuse, not military experience), and most veterans experiencing some form of disability have a challenging time for any educational funding once the time has expired to do so. There's also political reasons why the "gatekeepers" of PhD programs keep certain people out--most of which I'm not privy to, but a lot of which has to do with the fact that most PhD programs are funded by the government, so there's a limited amount of applicants they can accept, and they tend to only take in the elite by not only academic merit, but also race, age, and physical attractiveness, etc. The McNair program I was involved in was supposed to help, but they primarily focus on race and not on being the first generation or being disabled or being a nontraditional student--all of which are underrepresented, but they emphasize the term underrepresented as a race-based minority. So if you're mixed with White or Asian, you're pretty much screwed. I've known some people who were not considered a minority class or race but were nontraditional and/or disabled and/or first generation who never got accepted into one graduate program as a McNair scholar. There certainly needs to be more programs for undergraduate students to gain research and lab experience and publication opportunities when not a minority by race, but a minority in other ways. Once you graduate, unless you plan on incurring more debt for a second or third undergraduate degree, you have to find other means to get the experience and network you need for access to doctoral programs, and even some prestigious master-level programs.
My plan is to continue for 6 months as an undergrad alum in a lab and publish a peer-reviewed paper as first author. My plan after that is to find another lab I can volunteer with for free in order to get another year's worth experience in a lab, another published paper (no matter the author position), and a stronger recommendation. I also plan on studying for the GRE for an entire year and recalling the math I haven't done for 20 years, though I once aced a calculus class but can't seem to recall even the basic algebra and trig and geometry formulas to successfully complete the GRE. There are many people who struggle with similar issues when it comes to upward mobility through higher education, but the term higher education in the political realm--when dealing with impoverished or minority peoples--mainly has to do with undergraduate degrees. If one wants to go further, there are very few programs that offer funding for master's level or doctoral level programs. This SES divide further keeps some people from upwardly mobilizing, lest they incur over 100K to 400K of debt at a for-profit university that isn't accredited properly and has a very bad reputation at helping their doctoral or professional degree-holders find jobs.
My hope is to overcome all of these physical, mental, political, and discriminatory challenges somehow. My hope is to find the adequate health care I need, which is hard enough being on a fixed income and solely on Medicare. My hope is to find a transitional program that will give me the time I need (5 to 7 years) to transition off of disability, such as perhaps the Ticket to Work program that the SSA offers. My hope is to be a hope for other people like me. But to get over this hurdle during hard economic times and right before a new president gets elected is also challenging. Whatever changes will be made to the health care program, to educational funding, and to our economy might determine whether my plans will work or not.
People talk about why the disabled can't just get back to work. They don't understand that even people without a disability find themselves unable to find adequate employment, and they wind up needing public assistance and homeless shelters to get them by. They don't understand that the competition for procuring employment is high enough for those without disabilities, and almost damaging enough for those with disabilities. Additionally, there's a stigma that continues to exist about those with PTSD and otherwise, which has infiltrated the PhD programs, including psychology PhD programs. I find that ironic and hypocritical, but those that are more for the boulder model tend to not appreciate the vail model, so there are turf wars that exist within the field of psychology alone, and it would make sense that the boulder model gatekeepers would not want someone mentally disabled on their team. I've heard it from 2 or 3 horses' mouths, where the potential mentors of a boulder model PhD program I was interested in working with told me quite frank over an email or in person that to put anything about your disability in a personal statement will get your application in the rejection pile. The vail model (primarily PsyD programs) is more accepting of individuals because they are more practitioner-based and less research-based. However, more funding goes toward PhD programs than PsyD programs, and you have to wonder why there aren't enough qualified therapists out there, lest you include the underpaid and overworked social workers, MFTs, LPCs, and others. Some PhD programs offer a balance, but not when it comes to trauma studies. And more funding is now going toward neuropsychology and cognitive science than to clinical psychology that emphasizes trauma. Yet, in the criminal justice field, over 70% of adult criminals and about 90% of juvenile delinquents have experienced trauma, which is to say that they criminalize not only the mentally ill (which holds similar demographic statistics), but also trauma victims.
My passion stems from my PTSD and DID, my homeless experiences, my military experience, my experience in speaking as a volunteer of a church to criminals, juveniles, addicts, and homeless people struggling with trauma-related symptoms, even if they didn't meet the (substandard) screening for a bonafide trauma-related disorder. There are programs called trauma-informed programs that are supposed to help people in the community and in correctional facilities heal from their trauma, but the funding isn't there or the willingness of staff to learn these skills and employ them aren't there. And, to come back around to my original complaint about my personal statement including my disability or even experiences in overcoming my disability while also planning to pursue a career in helping further research and other trauma victims heal is now seen by boulder-program gatekeepers as a "liability" or "weakness" or "definite rejection." This is sad, and this is an open door to social justice. This shows me how messed up our higher educational and mental health care systems are! This shows me that there needs to be more people fighting for what I believe should be human rights. Instead, they leave it up to the criminal justice system, social workers, community non-profits (i.e., churches and other community organizations), etc.
If only faculty could see the passion I have to move research forward, to be a humanitarian and help trauma victims heal, to be qualified for PhD programs, I wouldn't be struggling half as much as I am today--and thousands or even hundreds more victims could find hope in procuring their dreams and upwardly mobilizing to the point of escaping poverty. If only.
My struggles concerning graduate school preparation are more on the level of wanting to now become an advocate, in addition to all of my other pursuits, which is not considered "politically correct" in academia or the clinical psych field. Sadly, I may have committed career suicide because I voiced to my undergraduate mentor these very things that I would hope to change, to better the systems. Perhaps he and others, being the gatekeepers they are, shun change and continue to keep people like me out. I've seen and heard from many students who both dropped out and successfully completed a PhD program in Clinical Psych while having PTSD and other mental disorders. It angers me to know that this is what I'm up against, that this is what many of my friends are up against. And I believe it is wrong.
But my mouth does get me in trouble, since I hate politics and will speak my mind--especially since I've learned to not be silent or secretive anymore about my childhood abuse or trauma. I've learned to embrace it as a testimony of strength, of overcoming adversity, of survival. I wish I knew how to eloquently state what people need to hear without the whole entire field seeing me as a "threat," though I have no clout and I'm sure they would see to it that I never get any. My goal is to help bring social justice to the minorities in terms of being trauma victims, of having a mental disability, and being nontraditional students seeking the highest* (not just higher in terms of an undregrad degree) type of education and upward mobility. I've spoken at a leadership conference about disability and disabled leaders, and have done enough private research to know that we need more disabled leaders in the workforce. Diversity is not just about race; it also includes SES, appearances, disability, age, etc. Discrimination laws spell it out, yet funding and emphasis is placed primarily on race issues, not other diversity issues. THEY ALL MATTER!