- Admin
- #1
anthony
Founder
I need feedback and ideas on what internal reference links we will possibly require in order to maintain articles.
What is an internal reference link? Well, citation for example in super-script, would be one. An editor may come along and edit something, as they read notice that a statement has no reference or proof, so they could implement a citation template for automatic quick finding later, after mentioning on the associated wiki pages thread page.
I inserted one into the example template: [DLMURL]http://www.ptsdforum.org/c/wiki/example-page/[/DLMURL] as an example.
What could you foresee being questions asked within internal documents that need to be marked as a reference point, for when we come back to it in order to fix?
The wikipedia, as an example, also uses [who] super-script, usually followed by a statement about someone did something, but not mentioning a name. That could be another one, but not sure yet... I want to keep it simple and realistic.
If something needing expanding maybe, then we could somehow mark it inline, ie. [Expand] in super-script, so you can see what needs expanding.
Thoughts?
What is an internal reference link? Well, citation for example in super-script, would be one. An editor may come along and edit something, as they read notice that a statement has no reference or proof, so they could implement a citation template for automatic quick finding later, after mentioning on the associated wiki pages thread page.
I inserted one into the example template: [DLMURL]http://www.ptsdforum.org/c/wiki/example-page/[/DLMURL] as an example.
What could you foresee being questions asked within internal documents that need to be marked as a reference point, for when we come back to it in order to fix?
The wikipedia, as an example, also uses [who] super-script, usually followed by a statement about someone did something, but not mentioning a name. That could be another one, but not sure yet... I want to keep it simple and realistic.
If something needing expanding maybe, then we could somehow mark it inline, ie. [Expand] in super-script, so you can see what needs expanding.
Thoughts?
