Kas_Can_Fly
Diamond Member
Yes I see that, I don't disagree in the slightest. I just feel that it is the police's job, not the media's, a little discretion and/or at least some tact might help. The investigation can go on, but why does the media have to be the mediator, why can the facts not stay between the victims, the police, any medical professionals if need be and the suspects.
Here's my problem - its being spread like gossip rather than news and treated in the same way. The potential criminals given all benefit of the doubt but not the victims. Why does it have to be made into such a debacle like some petty soap opera, when it is very much real. Why can't it be treated like what it is: News. People might debate it, it may be turned into satire, but usually people don't gossip about news like school girls. Also during the stage before conviction, the attention the Celebrity gets is through the roof and usually all in favour of, I'm not saying we all need to judge them evil immediately but how can people think that because they saw someone on the telly growing up that there's no chance that they could ever do something like that and all those people must be lying. You have no idea how many people were saying that about Jimmy Saville before everything came out. Even now people are still trying to make it acceptable because they are celebrities - ok, but what about the victims.
In the UK, there is rarely any help psychologically, how are all these victims coping? Are they leading healthy happy lives or coping to some extent or are they being penalised by the government, punished for being disabled, never given the help they need and deserve.
Most people don't doubt soldiers have PTSD, or those who were affected by 9/11, no they are or should at least be given some respect that they've been greatly affected by what wrong. Do people turn round and start defending war or potential extremist groups/individual?. Is that what it's even about? No, I don't think so. It's about the people who come back with a haunted head. Why can't the victims (or potential victims) involved be given some level of respect and not spoken about as if they caused it. At least a soldier goes to war with some knowledge that they will likely see terrible things. Does a child expect that by simply being alive, they will be abused? No of course not.
I'm glad you have heard a change in tack. Because I just keep hearing worse and worse things as the days pass. Mostly these don't occur to me, I hear, see or read them, but just the other day my GP asked me if when hospitalised they had changed my diagnosis, because he doubts the likelyhood of the PTSD diagnosis given to me by a qualified psychiatrist because he doesn't seem to understand why I've got it. In all fairness that's because he never received the letter from the psychiatrist as apparently the surgery don't open all the letters, only some :banghead: Well, my medical records are now being updated with a full trauma history, so no medical professional with access to my file will need a full explanaition as to "Why" I might have PTSD.
Sorry, sidetracked - I usually start a sentence and have moved on to a new topic before I've finished it. It's not that I disagree with the publication of it all, I just wish it was better in some way, for all parties involved. Not that I know how.
Here's my problem - its being spread like gossip rather than news and treated in the same way. The potential criminals given all benefit of the doubt but not the victims. Why does it have to be made into such a debacle like some petty soap opera, when it is very much real. Why can't it be treated like what it is: News. People might debate it, it may be turned into satire, but usually people don't gossip about news like school girls. Also during the stage before conviction, the attention the Celebrity gets is through the roof and usually all in favour of, I'm not saying we all need to judge them evil immediately but how can people think that because they saw someone on the telly growing up that there's no chance that they could ever do something like that and all those people must be lying. You have no idea how many people were saying that about Jimmy Saville before everything came out. Even now people are still trying to make it acceptable because they are celebrities - ok, but what about the victims.
In the UK, there is rarely any help psychologically, how are all these victims coping? Are they leading healthy happy lives or coping to some extent or are they being penalised by the government, punished for being disabled, never given the help they need and deserve.
Most people don't doubt soldiers have PTSD, or those who were affected by 9/11, no they are or should at least be given some respect that they've been greatly affected by what wrong. Do people turn round and start defending war or potential extremist groups/individual?. Is that what it's even about? No, I don't think so. It's about the people who come back with a haunted head. Why can't the victims (or potential victims) involved be given some level of respect and not spoken about as if they caused it. At least a soldier goes to war with some knowledge that they will likely see terrible things. Does a child expect that by simply being alive, they will be abused? No of course not.
I'm glad you have heard a change in tack. Because I just keep hearing worse and worse things as the days pass. Mostly these don't occur to me, I hear, see or read them, but just the other day my GP asked me if when hospitalised they had changed my diagnosis, because he doubts the likelyhood of the PTSD diagnosis given to me by a qualified psychiatrist because he doesn't seem to understand why I've got it. In all fairness that's because he never received the letter from the psychiatrist as apparently the surgery don't open all the letters, only some :banghead: Well, my medical records are now being updated with a full trauma history, so no medical professional with access to my file will need a full explanaition as to "Why" I might have PTSD.
Sorry, sidetracked - I usually start a sentence and have moved on to a new topic before I've finished it. It's not that I disagree with the publication of it all, I just wish it was better in some way, for all parties involved. Not that I know how.