• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

News Emdr causes brain damage?

  • Post starter Post starter Deleted member 42260
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 42260

I came across this site recently while researching EMDR. I noticed user and founder @anthony has claimed numerous times that EMDR therapy can cause brain damage, quite an alarming assertion. I could find no other evidence for this other than these comments. Whats up?

Has EMDR ever caused anyone to have brain damage and become a "Vegetable"?

It sounds absolutely absurd to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It sounds absurd to me too, quite absurd that you refer to people with brain damage as 'vegetables' though- is that a normal expression from
Where you come from? I've got brain damage, I've had EMDR, can confirm I have not yet become a vegetable :D Hope you find an answer to your question. Would love to read the articles which show I've made my brain damage worse by trying to recover from psychological trauma... messed up hey!
 
Iriseen, I used the term vegetable in quotations because that's the term that Anthony used in several of his comments regarding the alleged dangers of EMDR. Sorry if that seemed offensive, it was a bit offensive to me too. The link to the quote is in this comment below.

There were multiple threads where this was mentioned. I don't want to dig through all of them but here is the most significant that I could find. All quotes from Anthony although there is another user who often would adamantly agree although neither supported the claims with evidence.

EMDR Lashback - When EMDR Goes Wrong

from page 3:

"you should seek more along the lines of CBT for prolonged trauma, as its not as invasive nor does it have the consequences EMDR can and does have, ie. releasing too much trauma to cause brain damage."

and later on the same page in the thread:

"You will end up permanently brain damaged if she screws it up."

Then on page 4 Anthony says:

"The problem if it goes wrong is brain damage. This means, in a small dosage you could experience reliving your trauma on a heightened daily response. Basically your trauma is going to worse in your mind. If the damage is medium, the brain nearly fries itself, you could find some pretty serious states of shock, convulsions daily, loss of motor skills, etc etc.

If it totally went wrong, your looking at being pretty much a vegetable."

and then claims there are confirmed cases of this on page 5

"no person performing EMDR is going to outright tell what the down-side to fallout is. The facts though, is that there "has" been recorded and documented total and permanent brain failure from EMDR technique thus far"

------

So, what cases of brain damage? I could find no evidence of this. If it's not a fact, as claimed, then why are the claims so adamant? Is Anthony just outright lying?
 
Yeah he was talking about the fact that EMDR may not be appropriate for multiple traumas as it may be too much for the brain to handle, especially if someone is not ready to fully disclose their trauma history. It's very easy to take little snippets and
Of that thread and make it seem a certain way. But yeah he does say that it can cause brain damage.

I read it in the sense of that EMDR may not be appropriate in all situations and for all people. Its personal opinion I guess, and personal choice.
 
Last edited:
"It's very easy to take little snippets Of that thread and make it seem a certain way. But yeah he does say that it can cause brain damage."

So what are you saying?

I'm "taking it the wrong way" or he did indeed say it causes brain damage, multiple times and that people could end up a vegetable?

Because it seems pretty obvious to me.
 
Hi @Nai - thanks for the quotes. That provides more context.

Here's one that is more recent, and responds properly to the ones you pulled:
You're quoting 2007 content. EMDR was not efficacious in 2007, especially its practitioners. There were lots of issues, hence the post date and associated complications that were quite normal then.

EMDR is far better understood now than it was in 2007. It still is a powerful tool, and for certain individuals, not appropriate. For many others, it is the right way to go. Certain kinds of neurological disorders can be badly irritated by some EMDR methods; now, there's more of a 'toolkit' for EMDR practitioners to draw on, in order to either work around those, or work more gently. Studies have also shown that certain components of the traditional EMDR protocol may have no clinical value - even the titular eye movements may not be necessary.

I don't think anyone anywhere would say that 2007 commentary on EMDR is especially relevant to anyone in 2017.

More info becomes available, perspectives change. None of us on here claim to be clinicians. We read what is available, share resources and experiences, draw our own conclusions, share those, debate them...

You said you were looking into EMDR - are you considering it for yourself?
 
If you read that entire thread, posted by another member, now 10 years ago when EMDR was just making headway into trauma, EMDR was causing levels and forms of brain damage to persons self reported. If you research a little harder, you will find there have been quite a lot of people temporarily / permanently damaged by inexperienced therapists at that time, running off with EMDR and doing it wrong. The result had caused death to some people by suicide, due to being overwhelmed. Therapy does this still today, nothing new there. There are many reports by people who have had EMDR reporting different levels of brain function concern due to EMDR by inexperienced delivery.

It was a problem then, and prior, and progressively got better. You aren't putting it in context of the entire discussion, you're taking snippets, as mentioned above, then wrapping your own belief system / knowledge that brain damage equals vegetable. What does that even mean? PTSD causes certain forms of brain damage that they do not yet know how to undo. Are you a vegetable because you have PTSD? In the sense that I think you're using vegetable to say that brain damage means loss of all faculties -- you need to do a lot of research and probably get a more accurate term based on science today.

The member becvan of that thread talked about now having temporary / permanent memory problems that she didn't prior to an inexperienced, over-excited, therapist unleashing techniques upon her without full understanding of her history or implications. The therapist was at fault. EMDR was very new then. Further members added similar experiences. You can search the web for plenty of negative outcomes from EMDR, most therapies actually, and the problems a person now has as a result.

All claims I've ever read, were due to the therapist being at fault. Doing things with a technique without being experienced. Modifying techniques without care or concern of the outcome. Not doing due diligence in prior lead work to ensure they weren't going blind into repressed memories or other such problems that EMDR is known for over-flooding complications. If the therapist believes a client isn't being totally honest, they should not shift into EMDR, instead see what pops out -- there are better present centred therapeutic techniques for use that can be controlled better if flooding occurs where it shouldn't.

EMDR is one of the harder qualifications to obtain in therapy, and for good reason, because of all the issues discovered with the delivery, they made it harder to get the qualification into your own practice. You do considerable training today to be an EMDR therapist, compared to any other technique. You didn't 10 years ago. Why? Because EMDR has such potential to go very wrong, very quickly, in unexperienced hands. All techniques have this capacity, EMDR is a little more blind sided though due to the delivery technique using distraction.

EMDR is a good therapy for treating trauma. That does not mean it hasn't had a wonky history getting to where it is today. It has... and you can research its history yourself. There is still, to date, zero factual evidence to support eye movements impacting treatment efficiency for EMDR. EMDR has been categorised as an exposure treatment, contrary to the claims by Shapiro herself.

You can read a little about its history at EMDR Treatment: Still Less Than Meets the Eye? from a 1996 scathing review, then updated in 2011 with closer to what we now know and the effectiveness of EMDR today for trauma.

We with the severe levels of PTSD have certain levels of brain damage. Still not a vegetable though! Neuroscience has additionally proven our brains are quite malleable and plastique, that our brains create new neuronal pathways and cells, even though others have died / been damaged.

I think you need to relearn a better term, one that is not so offensive, IMHO. Brain damage does not make a person anything other than the impact of the damage itself. Mental health. Talk with any TBI sufferer -- pretty sure they do not cite themselves as vegetables and can function fine in many aspects of their lives -- they merely struggle in some areas due to the damage incurred.
 
If you research a little harder, you will find there have been quite a lot of people temporarily / permanently damaged by inexperienced therapists at that time, running off with EMDR and doing it wrong.

ok, Let's see some of those cases.

I can't find a single one which is strange if there are "quite a lot" of them.

You aren't putting it in context of the entire discussion, you're taking snippets, as mentioned above, then wrapping your own belief system / knowledge that brain damage equals vegetable.

I invite everyone to go read the thread and see that the implication of "brain damage and turning into a vegetable" is completely in context and that it's absurd to argue otherwise. Absurd or, you know, Lying.

So, go on show us some examples. Hell, I will make is easy for you, give us ONE example.
 
think you need to relearn a better term, one that is not so offensive, IMHO. Brain damage does not make a person anything other than the impact of the damage itself.

Oh now it's MY term? LOL really?

No one is saying it's not (I don't think).

Sweetheart, re-read my comment and understand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$930.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  51.7%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom