- Admin
- #1
anthony
Founder
I need to vent my absolute disguist in the [DLMURL="http://www.ptsdforum.org/announcement4.html"]posttraumatic stress disorder[/DLMURL] National course follow-up that I attended yesterday (31 Jan 06). The aim of the day, as written within the correspondence I received in regard to the day, was:
My experience went something more like this:
The first session was very good, as we discussed as a group how we had been, what progress / non-progress we had made. I left that session feeling quite good knowing I had improved, being allowed to let them know I had improved, and seeing a great deal of improvement overall from all other participants, except one.
The second session with the Dr was really nothing more than a waste of time. Why? Because our medications are managed privately and individually by our own psychiatrist / general practitioner. Yes sure, good to allow people to speak about their personal use and how they have either reduced, increased or completely dropped their individual medications, and how each of us have coped with that change. Some good, some not so good. Was the session really of any benefit to us? Not really. The session had no real benefit to how we where directly affected by the course, as the bulk of the conversation was wrapped up in the specifics of medication, and the importance of it. The time was wasted with nonsense, when more specific conversations could off been had in regard to how our medication would be a part / non-part of our lives now we have completed the course. Quite honestly, I don't think the session should even exist, as medication is not a follow-up criteria as it is constantly monitored by a GP / psychiatrist individually. Sufferers and spouses are always welcome to talk with their doctor about their medication, the affects it has, changes and so forth.
This session could have been spent better with group discussion on participants experience since the course with their individual medical needs, instead of dictated by a Dr on types of medications and so forth.
The next session was on pain management and a little on anger. I'm not sure that it was a neccessity to have anger management lectures, but more an open forum on participants anger success / failures since the course.
The last session was on communication skills, which really rehashed exactly what we learnt, where given lots of handouts and confirmed before we had even left the course. This session was more a learning outcome, than a discussion on how we have handled our unique communication issues since leaving the course.
Overall, a good waste of one day that did little more than infuriate me more than allow me to discuss my circumstances since leaving the course. Within the last session I raised the point about my thoughts on this, and the basic answer was, "DVA would never agree to a more open structured, relaxed course". Well, I don't honestly believe that, because if an open unstructured day is what does more good for the participants, then that to me would be more suitable than being dictated the same knowledge we have already learnt. What happened to the aim? What happened to getting feedback? We didn't get a lot of feedback out, as we where being rehashed for the most part on information we already had.
What did I expect? Well, I expected a day where we could discuss as a group, and learn from one anothers experience since the course, to help develop areas that one may still lack, though another has found good solutions for. This type of information is more productive, more insightful and more helpful than being told the same content as the course itself.
One person on that follow-up wasn't even asked a thing, and in actual fact, nor was I, it was just that I spoke up about a few things I had improved upon. Exactly how did the course achieve its aim, when one member walked away none the wiser? Another older member there spoke approximately one to two sentences the entire day, as his dictative wife spoke on his behalf, hence what most of his problem was before and during the course. When we left the course, she had said she would stop treating him like a child, and let him stand on his own two feet, but still, things resorted backwards. Nothing was really said about this, but more simply ignored and accepted by the course staff. Quite poor honestly.
By the end of the day, I was quite angry. The only thing I knew, was that the actual course itself was outstanding, and had worked for me, as I had calmed myself quite quickly through the disguist I felt for what wasn't accomplished within a follow-up day. Contrary to their beliefs, I removed myself from all medication (responsibly), which I found I suddenly have a lot more emotions and feeling back. This is what would be expected, though I didn't have these feeling before or during medication, though with the course itself, and the techniques used, I took myself off as I knew it was holding me back. It is this that actually gave me this feeling of disguist, and total disregard for what had been previously accomplished, and the feeling of ignorance I had, for what I thought was a day they would be interested in us all, and how we have been, communicated, socialised, improved, etc etc... but very little off that was even mentioned.
From the impression I had from their aim, I don't believe it was met. Disappointed is a great feeling I currently have, considering the course I attended located in Townsville, supposedly has the highest success rate within Australia for the PTSD program. Whilst they may have that, they certainly didn't demonstrate to myself that they cared about what we had become after the course. I was really quite angry at that, annoyed and hurt by it.
Does this mean I am a success from the course? Probably, as I certainly feel things I hadn't in a long long time, and I know it is thanks to that course. If the follow-up day was a test to see how far they could piss us off, and see whether we could maintain calm and anger emotions, then they succeeded to that aim, but certainly not the distrubuted one above.
There is another follow-up in June, which I certainly won't be attending now. I returned home to Melbourne more upset and disturbed than I thought I could ever be. I would have believed that a follow-up would be to "follow-up" on our stories and personal experiences since leaving, and not be dictated lectures. This trip has really upset me beyond what I had ever expected to happen. My pure disguist for the ignorance of not ensuring that all members where followed-up, and that all basic day to day angles where not covered, has given me enough stress to ensure I don't attend the next one.
I would most certainly catchup with all participants again, though just not within a dictated environment. The friends I now have from this course are some of the best, most trusted people in my life now, though the course itself, I'm afraid that just ended here for me.
The aim of the follow-up is to get feedback from participants about the ups and downs they have experienced, to review the skills we have learnt and to confirm and expand on communication skills. There will also be one session with Dr < name > where participants would have the opportunity to discuss health issues. Also, you will have to fill in the ACPMH questionnaire again. Please let us know if there are any other issues that you want us to include in the program.
My experience went something more like this:
- Firstly, I had to fly from Melbourne to Townsville to attend a one day followup, that was meant to find out how exactly I was going since the course (as per the aim above). The flight was great and a mate who is also a course participant picked me up from the airport.
- Checked into motel, where we caught up with another couple from the course.
- Myself and Troy (who picked me up) went to the pub, had a few light beers, a good chat and then both went to bed.
- Let the follow-up begin:
- The first session was with a phycologist from the original course, which went into how we have been, coping mechanisms and so forth, as an individual / partnership. Two people with PTSD did not even say a word, as they where not asked.
- The next session was with the Dr (psychiatrist) who asked us about our current medications, if we anyone had decreased / increased them and so forth. Not something I personally found helpful for a one day course, but none the less, had to be done as the course Dr. Again though, one person was not even asked, nor said a word.
- The next session was delivered by a very lovely lady who is a pain management specialist, and also has PTSD.
- The last session was on communication skills, partner communication and social interaction.
- We then all left, and some off us caught up later that night for dinner and a chat together.
The first session was very good, as we discussed as a group how we had been, what progress / non-progress we had made. I left that session feeling quite good knowing I had improved, being allowed to let them know I had improved, and seeing a great deal of improvement overall from all other participants, except one.
The second session with the Dr was really nothing more than a waste of time. Why? Because our medications are managed privately and individually by our own psychiatrist / general practitioner. Yes sure, good to allow people to speak about their personal use and how they have either reduced, increased or completely dropped their individual medications, and how each of us have coped with that change. Some good, some not so good. Was the session really of any benefit to us? Not really. The session had no real benefit to how we where directly affected by the course, as the bulk of the conversation was wrapped up in the specifics of medication, and the importance of it. The time was wasted with nonsense, when more specific conversations could off been had in regard to how our medication would be a part / non-part of our lives now we have completed the course. Quite honestly, I don't think the session should even exist, as medication is not a follow-up criteria as it is constantly monitored by a GP / psychiatrist individually. Sufferers and spouses are always welcome to talk with their doctor about their medication, the affects it has, changes and so forth.
This session could have been spent better with group discussion on participants experience since the course with their individual medical needs, instead of dictated by a Dr on types of medications and so forth.
The next session was on pain management and a little on anger. I'm not sure that it was a neccessity to have anger management lectures, but more an open forum on participants anger success / failures since the course.
The last session was on communication skills, which really rehashed exactly what we learnt, where given lots of handouts and confirmed before we had even left the course. This session was more a learning outcome, than a discussion on how we have handled our unique communication issues since leaving the course.
Overall, a good waste of one day that did little more than infuriate me more than allow me to discuss my circumstances since leaving the course. Within the last session I raised the point about my thoughts on this, and the basic answer was, "DVA would never agree to a more open structured, relaxed course". Well, I don't honestly believe that, because if an open unstructured day is what does more good for the participants, then that to me would be more suitable than being dictated the same knowledge we have already learnt. What happened to the aim? What happened to getting feedback? We didn't get a lot of feedback out, as we where being rehashed for the most part on information we already had.
What did I expect? Well, I expected a day where we could discuss as a group, and learn from one anothers experience since the course, to help develop areas that one may still lack, though another has found good solutions for. This type of information is more productive, more insightful and more helpful than being told the same content as the course itself.
One person on that follow-up wasn't even asked a thing, and in actual fact, nor was I, it was just that I spoke up about a few things I had improved upon. Exactly how did the course achieve its aim, when one member walked away none the wiser? Another older member there spoke approximately one to two sentences the entire day, as his dictative wife spoke on his behalf, hence what most of his problem was before and during the course. When we left the course, she had said she would stop treating him like a child, and let him stand on his own two feet, but still, things resorted backwards. Nothing was really said about this, but more simply ignored and accepted by the course staff. Quite poor honestly.
By the end of the day, I was quite angry. The only thing I knew, was that the actual course itself was outstanding, and had worked for me, as I had calmed myself quite quickly through the disguist I felt for what wasn't accomplished within a follow-up day. Contrary to their beliefs, I removed myself from all medication (responsibly), which I found I suddenly have a lot more emotions and feeling back. This is what would be expected, though I didn't have these feeling before or during medication, though with the course itself, and the techniques used, I took myself off as I knew it was holding me back. It is this that actually gave me this feeling of disguist, and total disregard for what had been previously accomplished, and the feeling of ignorance I had, for what I thought was a day they would be interested in us all, and how we have been, communicated, socialised, improved, etc etc... but very little off that was even mentioned.
From the impression I had from their aim, I don't believe it was met. Disappointed is a great feeling I currently have, considering the course I attended located in Townsville, supposedly has the highest success rate within Australia for the PTSD program. Whilst they may have that, they certainly didn't demonstrate to myself that they cared about what we had become after the course. I was really quite angry at that, annoyed and hurt by it.
Does this mean I am a success from the course? Probably, as I certainly feel things I hadn't in a long long time, and I know it is thanks to that course. If the follow-up day was a test to see how far they could piss us off, and see whether we could maintain calm and anger emotions, then they succeeded to that aim, but certainly not the distrubuted one above.
There is another follow-up in June, which I certainly won't be attending now. I returned home to Melbourne more upset and disturbed than I thought I could ever be. I would have believed that a follow-up would be to "follow-up" on our stories and personal experiences since leaving, and not be dictated lectures. This trip has really upset me beyond what I had ever expected to happen. My pure disguist for the ignorance of not ensuring that all members where followed-up, and that all basic day to day angles where not covered, has given me enough stress to ensure I don't attend the next one.
I would most certainly catchup with all participants again, though just not within a dictated environment. The friends I now have from this course are some of the best, most trusted people in my life now, though the course itself, I'm afraid that just ended here for me.
Last edited: