• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

What Feels Like A Therapy Blow Out - Guilt, Consternation, Fatigue.

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is all crazy to hear. But I lost it in therapy too. I looked at her straight in the face and said " I am sick of you, sick of myself, my girlfriends family and their 2 cents, sick of everything!" :stop:

It hurt. It was a sign that I was hiding something for a long time and it was about to come to a head....

If you are in couples therapy, remember this..... 'You always have the right to meetings one on one'.
 
Thanks for your concern,

Still a muddle inside, although I'm trying my best to frame matters in a constructive fashion. During the T. session most recently concluded I tried convey that an identity suffused with an awareness of many an issue cultivated over time and processed through the perceptual apparatus of what I'll call depressive realism equates to core identity. Maybe on the defensive, I tried if you will to express myself to the extent of telegraphing a larger understanding of the issues at play within the academic library/'subprime' post-secondary educational opportunity environment I struggled to exist within - although doubtlessly I simply exhaled a lot of hot air.

To be at the mercy of many who function seemingly better sans understanding or even curiosity about a great many matters will always strike me as a cheat of sorts. I struggle so to disengage my various trauma legacies from what is typically manifest as activist zeal. I do a disservice to myself to the extent that what I commonly telegraph translates out as barely contained loneliness and resentment. No - I don't have an answer for myself even as I recognize the poisonous course of some disease within me.

Consistent too with being on the defensive I invoked long-time identification with certain public policy and public interest individuals behind historical reform efforts of worth, or behind greater transparency/clarity in the public policy and market realm. I tried if you will to call to mind that someone such as Ralph Nader seems to many not to possess a robust sense of humor, and for his example, that awareness of the discrepancies between what is and what may be needn't stop one from endeavoring to remain constructively engaged even if no revolutionary/millennial paradise is to be secured. Gosh, I have a 1906 copy of Upton Sinclair's The Jungle, maybe a second edition of the same author's OIL! - the basis of the film There Will Be Blood, and a great many other works across periods that hardly equate to legitimizing inert turning away from much. Reading such material in detail leave open the question as to what will be my (or anyone's) contribution to society if awareness has been cultivated and won't strictly be denied...

Though not asked of me, with stick drive in hand I visited a local university and downloaded about fifteen academic journal articles dedicated to the question of afforded occupational and interpersonal relation guidance to gifted children and adults as well. Trying to verse myself in such, although fatigued I do believe for some of the material read isn't strictly scholarly. Anecdotes and the celebration of an orientation carry me only so far, although reportage conveyed through the experiences of others who too fall silent in crowds for connections not made, topic knowledge that precludes ready conversation, and the implied need to constantly and creatively assert in the direction of establishing new ties within more appropriate cultures and nodes of interest are insights worth cataloging.

All of this still sums up to 'grim determination' - something my T. (and doubtlessly many here) wish for me to evolve beyond to the extent of the actual enjoyment of some aspects of life. I'm not sure I know how to do this - or if I can learn. Again, better experiences have been too fleeting, and certainly apportioned in a fashion that precluded the development of a solipsistic attitude towards much. This awareness, manifest a hundred ways has the effect of blunting enthusiasm for mainstream ambitions many harbor even as my interest in my topics may bubble through in a fashion akin to joy - funny this.

School efforts (i.e. the pursuit of a Ph.D. looking at the 2013-2014 application season from Dec. 1st, 2013 to January 15th, 2014) will consume my energies quite thoroughly for the time being. I greatly regret I have little company but that within books to guide me, although much like the PTSD community happily accessed here, resources exist online. I want human company, and yet such isn't guaranteed in the short term and may not strictly be availed to me even five or seven years out. Grim determination then, although no strict desire to emphasize the word 'grim'. Kind thanks and kindest regards...


M.
 
Greetings,

I'm not at all sure I want to continue with my present therapist. It seems she places the Freudian conception of optimal psychological functioning right at the top and seemingly invalidates any other perception I might have for smooth functioning in life equates to exemplifying the very best adaptation to society - and what society or facets of it represent be damned. This is psych. without sociological awareness or so much as curiousity, whereas the legitimacy of what I'd experience as cognitive dissonance is not something she seems capable of understanding for she doesn't accept the legitimacy of perceptions and cognitions other than those that equate, once again, to smooth functioning. I'm finding I'm tired, wondering why I would bother to take up psychology and psych. topics if this person clearly cannot be troubled to invest in the slightest in formal sociological study - and seems proud of it at that.

For that cluttered and doubtlessly confusing statement some example clearly must be afforded, and hence I'll do just that in the hope that something here will be understood. I spoke of visiting an area public library, feeling a certain loneliness for the role and always the fellowship of that tiny percentage of individuals who might prove like-attuned not only to matters that capture my attention, but also sensitized in a rough fashion to matters that satisfy less about the idealized role when contrasted to what often characterizes what is demonstratably popular in particular.

So - what happened? I was looking at a promotional blurb seen on the homepage of the library in question. A program was scheduled for that night - something about a speaker addressing whomever in attendance about his capacity to read into character - strengths, weaknesses, capacities, etc. by carefully evaluating facial features. Various historical personages would be discussed in turn, etc., etc. My heart sank as I read this, for was such so removed from the pseudoscience of phrenology? Memories wicked in further relation to how I was required to devise programs in the space of a public library for teens and though guided by clear intent consistent with informing and even in the most modest sense - elevating tastes for creating something I (and a few silent educated allies) might be proud of, the downmarket popular culture programming invariably had people line up around the block just outside the doors of the library.

Some admittedly vain sense of supporting the public interest motivated me to embrace library work, and yet carnival programs were what filled seats. This hurt, it still hurts, and I suppose I wanted to briefly talk to a librarian there just scratch at the surface to determine if on some well-hidden level - did they feel the same? Did they also secretly register regret that in true Ortega y Gassett fashion that mass culture had driven out high culture? Please, just evidence of a discreet sigh, a look that I might remember and tuck away in memory to know that they knew and that in turn we could wordlessly support each other in our resigned perceptions. Oh, I so needed this!

It definitely wasn't to be, and though I expressed matters quietly and with reasoned economy to the librarian I chatted up, somehow my one-person audience surmised that I was going to attend the program and equated it with quality. Crestfallen and embarrassed, I made my way to the door feeling quite an awful person. Why am I so critical and mean? At least this is what I dwelled upon recalling circumstances again where thirty other employees could confide in each other about most everything given they seemed at about the same level, drawing most of their perceptions from the popular culture, and not given to engaging in what will loosely be termed here as critical thought. In short, they in all likelihood hadn't been predisposed to inquire and gather material consistent with demonstrating a critical turn of mind, and without reserve stocks of ideas, concepts, traditions, etc. such couldn't be reasonably expected. Good people, dedicated to their work and families surely - but something missing. I dare to talk - really needing to take the temperature of the room - or even in a discreet sense talk to but one person in the hope of finding connection - and yet hopes dashed!

Relating this to my therapist took me nowhere. Sensing my longing to connect, what she surmised is that I wanted to be part of this culture, that my own orientation and identity 'doesn't work', and that in sum I'm a stewing dish of half-sublimated envy. Wow - that wasn't my point. I'm not sure that was ever the point, whereas desiring community isn't the same as registering despair for searching for the same in the wrong quarters. Tossing out another example, our often wretched families and family history does not invalidate our respective desire for what we see as good of other family dynamics. I'm entirely fatigued for I don't think she has any more insights contained within her felt hat.

At one point I registered despair again for what materials I'd reviewed independently concerning the topic of masochism mixed if you will with a tendency towards passive-aggression. I bemoaned that the deeply unpleasant range DSM-articulated personality disorders that 'exist' (nastier still should you look at older materials that define such as 'character disorders') seem so deeply rooted (in a manner akin to the masochism materials read it is understood) that I wondered if one could in fact reasonably deconstruct such and evolve beyond. For the response afforded, I wonder why I shared of myself so...

She took an incredibly tattered DSM IV TR down and read each element of what the field equates as the constitutive elements of a character disorder. Great confidence displayed by her - but again, devoid of sociological context and awareness. I displayed neurological difficulties given what seemed a plainly inadequate adaptation to the circumstance of living in the contemporary world - this without the lightest curiousity of the implications of what constitutes creative and compelling engagment with a deeply imperfect world within which I feel no place.

"Don't think about it" or "...don't read about it and simply go forward even as you've studied the issues in detail in a manner others haven't" isn't advice I can place much stock in, let alone faith. Others evidence more in the way of normative behaviours and attitudes - but maybe in a careful and tenative sense I might say here not I'm not strictly sold on being one of them. In sum, I'm growing increasingly restless and bored by a dynamic that doesn't seem to include a capacity to include perceptions that aren't strictly a pose. I feel not so good for this, and hence I had to write or record my thoughts on the matter - somewhere, anywhere.

By her standards catharsis cleanses and matters are just as neatly contained, with life revealed to be worth living - such makes for good television drama. I don't think she strictly understands involuntary emotionally-fueled traumatic recall even as I wish for higher brain processing of much and the attempt to build and strengthen interpretive pathways to override lower brain function; i.e. I'm not a faulty washing machine that fails to drain properly. Those who might (even with the kindest of intent) question my capacity for self awareness should for so-reading my messages know a bit better...

In particular, the DSM IV isn't the book I would carry away to a desert island, whereas possession of a Ph.D. in one field doesn't consitute a waiver not to investigate why a great many people, many profoundly traumatized, but others less so nevertheless seek to creatively deconstruct and ponder the world they pass through. My therapist picks up on the quite real PTSD-charged aspects of whatever it is that constitute my habits of intellectual assertion, but tosses out what I would hope to be reasoned and nuanced aspects of viewpoints and perceptions that aren't strictly and solely PTSD on fire. I feel stuck and my capacity to evidence respect is slipping away. Not sure anyone might read all of this compressed blather, but thank you if you might have taken the time to do so. Kind regards to the community...

M.
 
Pencil, I'm confused! What community do you mean - the PTSD forum? That's my understanding of the meaning. RB please correct me if I've misunderstood.
 
Resilientbibliophile,

I had several thoughts as I read what you wrote.

One is that I sympathise with you over public libraries. I have a friend who's a librarian, and she told me that recently a library was trying to draw people in with a craft event. I'm all for craft but don't connect this with libraries, and asked what the relevance was. She said, "Anything that will get people to come to libraries", and I couldn't help wondering why books can't be what gets people to libraries.

Regarding your therapist, you will know best whether she's the right therapist for you. I think it's essential to feel that a therapist is on the same wavelength as you, or is at least sympathetic enough to your wavelength. I loved my previous therapist very much. Even though she didn't really see the world as I did, she was willing to hear how I saw it and to work on that basis. My beliefs, world view and approaches are not mainstream, so I wouldn't necessarily find a therapist who thought exactly the same way - but it was important to find one who could work with me in the way I needed. Really, it's all about whether you can work together.
 
Hi,

To me 'kind regards to the community' is intended to be consistent with celebrating what constitutes the best spirit of understanding and constructive criticism present here. A huge outpouring of pain features everyday of course, but somehow even as terrible as many of us feel there is evidence all about of people attempting to share like-experiences and, even if imperfectly, telegraph to those in need that we're not alone with all that we carry. I accept that I run the risk of sowing confusion for my words and manner in a real sense invite it. My apologies then...

-

In a sense I carried into library work poorly informed perceptions about both the role of a librarian and the tone of what constitutes service and services on offer. My thinking was clouded, my perceptions in full truth decidedly impaired when I positioned my such thus. Unappealing and as unflattering it is to relate here, I thought by working in a library I might avoid people. I so thought that whatever constitutes my combination of strengths and weaknesses that I absolutely had to downshift and downscale ambitions if I was to function in a work role, and I suppose in a least common denominator sense I did myself and the field a decided disservice for sharply (and arrogantly) underestimating the public contact and selfless service aspect of a role where subjective perceptions of worth and value in point of fact have nearly no place. It's very hard for me to accept this, to reconcile myself to the fact that an evolving commitment to something I felt I could do did in time become toxic and clearly not for me.

I suppose too that I'm in denial that the experiences had within and across two libraries were so unfortunate. I keep thinking that I can shrug off poor experience, that I can reengage libraries and not be bothered about aspects of the larger culture that in point of fact seriously concern me. I read social theory and other topics only to show up to engage others on the level of affording basic reference service and - perhaps little wonder, I feel stifled and deeply unhappy. It's almost certain that to shift my circumstance markedly that Ph.D. study is the way forward even if guides strongly suggest not. The greater horror and danger is for me to return to circumstances that haven't worked before evidencing the same if not greater intellectual (not to shortchange interpersonal by any means for all know how isolated I feel) stimulation for such just isn't going to be found there. The 'easy solution'; i.e. not returning to school, isn't any kind of a solution. The conclusion is both clarifying and heartbreaking...

-

Indeed, I don't want to dispense with a therapist in haste. Selfishly I do suppose, I want that person (fill in the blank with whomever might fit the bill) to be exceedingly strong across many a topic and issue. A perch atop a mountain where they set up office would be good. A six-foot long beard might also help. I guess I desire shock and awe in a conversational sense and am given to feeling helpless when I detect the outlines of practical limits of understanding. I suppose in a sense we all do. Thanks everyone...

M.
 
My apologies then...

RB

No, let me explain.

You are so unbelievably analytical, and at the same time you don't seem to think someone would read to the end, so I played a kind of game, to see how you would respond.

As part of this community, your statement 'kind regards to the community' places distance between you and 'your' community. Throughout your post, you express a distancing from society, as I think many people on this forum do, myself included.

So, my post said:
1. I read every word of yours
2. 'community' can be interpreted as this community or the community in which the library functions, which in turn is part of society, with all its foibles, and which you don't want to be part of, despite your 'longing to connect'.

As part of this community, your regards can only be conveyed directly, not via another. And so I was waiting to see if you would start analyzing what I meant by community, as surely you do connect HERE, as a member who communicates.

An emoticon might have helped to make my intention clearer, but decided against it as you do not use emoticons.

Pencil
 
A perch atop a mountain where they set up office would be good. A six-foot long beard might also help.

I wish we were allowed posts that were only an emoticon with no words, because there really are no words to respond to that!! Usually I'd suggest to people that they discuss with their therapist what they want and see if they can negotiate it with them but... do you think that would be a good look for her? ;)
 
Thanks for the kind interest and response both,

Indeed I'm a blend of qualities that mixes heady engagement with the chilliest remote detachment equating to the maintenance of slim hope for connection. It's almost as though I've created in my person and evidence in my orientation a will to fly, but when the same is pushed out onto the tarmac and pointed towards the wind I can't be troubled to set the flaps into the correct position. It isn't even a habit of mine to allow my hand to brush the controls to ensure that correct procedure and/or correct protocol is followed - disconcerting this. It’s almost as though I rhapsodize about how I’ll so precisely move those controls – and yet the forearm does not stir.

The same goes for gatherings however constituted that I attend. I attend yes, but am I present, and who would dare imagine that I actually participate? In relation to debates afoot regarding the expression of and evolving trends rooted in the understanding of conceptions of community, I read - although as the reader might reasonably surmise I do this in satellite flyby fashion from several miles up in the sky. It’s almost as though I refuse to be touched, speaking into a phone but not bothering to dial a number before speaking into the receiver. I both long to feel and at the same moment feel far too much. Rather too like a museum display allowing inspection of a period domestic scene that in a surfacy sense seemingly equates to intimacy, although the discreet placement of barriers and glass panels nevertheless firmly communicates that one isn’t at home and fears that one might never participate in full.

-

As a partial aside, please employ emoticons as you might see fit, while as a general rule to those passing through my wobbly orbit, worry not to mimic the sometimes turgid style I too frequently display. Though I might be on the lookout for one with a six foot long beard – bearded lady or no (!), what vain quality assessment I make will almost surely be based on other things.

-

As has been proven, there will be times when I'm revealed to be terribly dense, whereas for so-calling attention to my atrophied understanding of much therein lies the hope that I might be prompted to reconsider much and evolve thereby. Although it takes time to understand many a nuance bearing upon ‘my case’, it is not as though I've fallen so great a distance but rather that I've not risen so far upward to feel one of the interpersonal living.

So true it is that I carry within a shell-shocked presumption that I’ll not be read, let alone understood in detail. In my constricted world I frequently do not interact beyond the rudiments of the exchange of social pleasantries and modest requests to fill needs I might harbor. Consistent with being pleasant and not calling great attention to myself, I take care to breathe in and restrict my use of language to the spoken essential when encountered live. Long disposed to affording some conception of aid or help to others, it is my longstanding habit to silently avail myself of what others dictate is important, as worthy of attention and engagement.

Outside the office of my therapist infrequent it is that anyone might address me by name. It seems I’m forced online, although explorations of the social terrain of a sprawling suburbanscape with universities and matching nodes of creativity and eclectic assertion do exist here and there. Though not a diagnosed Aspy, it does seem that negotiating social space and evolving out a functional understanding of boundaries not simply individual or immediate interpersonal, but by way of larger groups and gathering not stopping short of society and its demands overwhelms in so many ways.

Study of materials relating to socio-emotional isolation commonly focus upon the circumstance of the aged and infirm, whereas abuse and neglect materials rooted in the practice of parenting gone awry are commonly those that emphasize the alarmingly real aspect of sexual and/or physical violence ‘abnormalized’ within specific but also overlapping circumstances that give rise to patterns of abuse transcending the requirement of the seminal circumstance but forming a certain gravitation pull for familiarity of circumstance. It sometimes seems hard if not unfair that material on emotional neglect requires such stamina to identify, isolate, unearth and study. And yet one does not stop for what hope might exist if such temptation isn't strictly resisted?

Another dimension to the workload is the perceptual processing of what are often abuse narratives where a male exercises appalling leverage upon a female so-situated, and even as this is so often the pattern, I almost wish to create a computer algorithm whereby gender roles are ‘swapped’, the age of the players is reduced, hence scenarios and the examples afforded might be afforded greater subjective power. Men are too frequently terrible to each other and terrible to women in particular – this we know.

Some things happened and then repeated in cyclical fashion across time where women were in control and I was not. I wasn’t sodomized by a father/older brother/family friend, although there are times when I voicelessly express consternation as to where ‘my’ literature is. One comes close, one explores, and one tries theories and viewpoints on for size under the presumption that such are the parameters of investment in possible accommodation reached via the embrace of complexity and that not yet formally committed to type.

Even as I hadn’t quite the words and concepts at the ready to express as much at the time, when I worked within the public library in an implicit fashion I really was hoping for an experience of community – something to fill the void within myself. That I deeply underestimated the value of fit, that certain matters couldn't be forced, that for personal history but also intellectual inclinations that I’d in essence undercut the chances that I could find some measure of personal affirmation and actualized identity within an ‘off-the-rack’ community – especially one evangelical Christian rooted, was my painful discovery.

‘They’ were not the problem, whereas for poor choice of context to share select aspects of myself (poorly developed boundaries again, yes – indeed) my experiment miscarried. Though deeply underplayed, in point of fact I’ve known very few environments in detail across a life that otherwise ought to have featured more in the way of risk taking consistent with meeting the challenge of finding an appropriate fit. I’ve passed through and sampled many, whereas I usually just return to my books searching for that next spark or succession of sparks.

Though likely fodder to flesh out other submissions to come, there was a time when I attended school in NYC, within the physical space of Manhattan/Greenwich Village, but the mental and spiritual space of what is termed the American Literary Left. Habits of mind, proclivities that guided me there included study of materials picked up at area used book shops and thrift stores published during times of tumult, whereas in a sense I was alternately emboldened but also deformed in my perceptions of the world based upon the embrace of works that seemed so light, so gay as contrasted to the gray particulars of my actual life. Habituating college towns, attending lectures, melding self into the atmosphere and spirit of protests however manifest too has been tried with aspects of search being blended into a conception of identity. Still, bridging what seems the chasm between my dissociated splendor and an actual lived existence constitutes the maturational hurdle I need to successfully clear.

If one has seen the remake of the Spanish film Open Your Eyes in the form of Cameron Crowe’s Vanilla Sky, I find myself in circumstances akin to the end of the film whereby I might remain within an extended dissociative slumber, or dare to assert myself come what may to experience an imperfect life that is nevertheless and by sharp contrast real. Do I consciously stop or override the patently inadequate illusion to embrace life – whatever that life holds? Can I step off the ledge of the building to telegraph in no uncertain fashion my uncompromising desire to be present, an actor within my own skin? Thanks for reading, thanks for listening, thanks for constituting my tiny self-selected audience. Kind regards to this community then…


M.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom