• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

News Paedophilia Rights Vs Homosexuality Rights

Status
Not open for further replies.
My friend posted it because the article had her hopping mad. She's a counselor specializing in sexual abuse victims, and she couldn't wrap her head around the concept of people condoning that behavior.

Is the article real, or is it a a mash of poorly quoted so called info?
 
Yeah they do. I've been in one. I was 13 or 14 and he was about 30 or 32.

Same here... when I was 13 years old my first "consensual" sexual relationship was with a 19/20 year old "man." At age 16 I had two different "relationships" with men who were 28/29 years old. At 17 a 30ish man. At the time I did not see a problem. I enjoyed the relationships and seriously had no clue that it was inappropriate. Now I have a 16 year old daughter and I am so fiercely protective that I think I have made her afraid of relationships.
 
Yes unfortunately that crap is real.

I know Law & Order SVU isn't real but they get their ideas from real life. They had an episode on this topic maybe 5 or so years ago?
 
Is the article real, or is it a a mash of poorly quoted so called info?
Do you mean are the kind of quotes real and people really think those things about their agenda with children or do you mean is there any credibility in the so called experts seeming support for them?

Like others have said there are a whole community who work full time promoting this sick agenda and yes they really do believe it. As for the so called support. It is manipulation of information that turns it into something it never was. As close to lies as you can get. The idea that there is legitimacy there is laughable but scary. Thats the worrying part. How they wrap it up in a way that appears to give it legitimacy

The horrible thing is how sneakily the nasty stuff is embedded in the article isn't it?
 
The "experts" who support them like to make a LOT of money being professional "witnesses" in defense cases where they discredit child victims and denounce the perpetrator's crimes as being normal exploration.

The horrible thing is how sneakily the nasty stuff is embedded in the article isn't it?

It is manipulation of information that turns it into something it never was.

I'm glad it's not just me that sees it then. I was taken aback at just how f*cked up the article really was, if this kind of shit became mainstream, I think it would be perfectly ok to turn into a 'doomsdayer' and move into a godforsaken corner of the planet permanently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom