Democracy is a completely false ideal
A gang of drunken teenage males staggering down a road towards a good looking woman.
If the drunken males offer her a vote in deciding which of them gets to assault her first - have they granted her a new right?
If will of a majority justifies the use of force, then as an instance of will of a majority - a gang rape must therefore be justified.
We are each well capable of making our own decisions, or if we want to, of each selecting advisors, or people to represent us on each issue that we individually want help with.
Such an advisor has a vested interest to give the best advice they can, or they'll soon find themselves getting fired.
none of that selection of advisors or representatives implies that:
- one group of people should decide for everyone
- that the group appointed should define the extent to which they'll decide for everyone
- that they should do it for a fixed term, rather than be hired and fired as each individual sees fit
- that a majority (or the largest minority) should decide for everyone
- that the advisors decide how much they'll get paid and can print the money, or run up debts in your name to do it.
even if it was accepted that we must all have people to make decisions for us (something which I dis agree with) then claiming that we must all have the same group of advisors or decision makers...
Is like claiming that because we each had to have a biological father, then we all had to have the same biological father.
If it would be wrong for me as an individual to order another individual to give me money, to go to war for me, to do this that and the other... or else, I'll shoot their dogs, put them in a cage, beat them up, take even more of their property from them etc!
then it would also be wrong for two of me to do so
and equally wrong for two hundred million of me to do so
Social contracts and constitutions:
Did you sign one?
Did anyone you know sign one?
would anyone who you know be stupid enough to sign a contract that puts all of the onus to pay and obey onto you, while leaving all of the details of what you're to do and how much you are to pay completely open to change, and absolutely no obligation on the other side of the contract to deliver anything that they might promise to deliver?
[GALLERY=media, 3045]Lysander-Spooner-didnt-sign-shit by Anarchy posted Apr 24, 2016 at 4:24 PM[/GALLERY]
Democracy: two wolves and a sheep deciding who to have for supper.
Representative republic: two wolves and a sheep voting for a third wolf, who'll decide who to have for supper.