Kas_Can_Fly
Diamond Member
I just wanted to know how others feel about the term survivor. I would like to point out before I go on that I do not have a problem with other people using the term survivor about themselves or others. I will even accept them using it towards me.
In relation to my own situation, I find the word a little distressing and more than a little irritating. The people who abused me did not want to kill me, they didn't want my scars to be visible, or for me to break completely. They wanted someone who would serve their purpose and would not give them away - I know they were manipulative and took pleasure from it, but if I had died all that would have changed is they would have lost their play thing and possibly been caught by the police.
In this situation then, I did not survive. They got what they wanted, as often as they wanted. Their intent was not to kill, instead my body suffered, my mind shattered and if I believed fully in the existence of souls, then I believe mine would have been blackened and twisted. It would have been kinder to kill me, but they left me alive again for their benefit. How can someone say that this is surviving?
In terms of Rape, I presume that most of perpetrators do not want to kill the person, they either want some sexual gratification, power, feeling of control, or all three. They may even want to hurt that person, but do they really want to kill you?
See to me the definition of surviving is to escape a life threatening event, whether that is a natural disaster, war, murder attempt, road accident, torture with the intent of murder or accident involving a risk upon ones life. So to me, to be alive after something which although may have been designed to cause you infinite amounts of pain, mentally and physically, but NOT designed to end your life, is just being on the other side of the event(s), the way your abuser(s) had meant you to be.
Am I getting this all wrong? Is survivor meant to mean something different? What does survivor mean to you?
Thanks in advance
AJ
xx
In relation to my own situation, I find the word a little distressing and more than a little irritating. The people who abused me did not want to kill me, they didn't want my scars to be visible, or for me to break completely. They wanted someone who would serve their purpose and would not give them away - I know they were manipulative and took pleasure from it, but if I had died all that would have changed is they would have lost their play thing and possibly been caught by the police.
In this situation then, I did not survive. They got what they wanted, as often as they wanted. Their intent was not to kill, instead my body suffered, my mind shattered and if I believed fully in the existence of souls, then I believe mine would have been blackened and twisted. It would have been kinder to kill me, but they left me alive again for their benefit. How can someone say that this is surviving?
In terms of Rape, I presume that most of perpetrators do not want to kill the person, they either want some sexual gratification, power, feeling of control, or all three. They may even want to hurt that person, but do they really want to kill you?
See to me the definition of surviving is to escape a life threatening event, whether that is a natural disaster, war, murder attempt, road accident, torture with the intent of murder or accident involving a risk upon ones life. So to me, to be alive after something which although may have been designed to cause you infinite amounts of pain, mentally and physically, but NOT designed to end your life, is just being on the other side of the event(s), the way your abuser(s) had meant you to be.
Am I getting this all wrong? Is survivor meant to mean something different? What does survivor mean to you?
Thanks in advance
AJ
xx