This one bothers me; it's tough to know what to say.
While I don't wish to start a debate, acrimonious or not ;), it always bothers me that people really believe US citizens have a Constitutional right to own any kind of gun they want to, just because they want to. That's not what the Bill actually says. Being a former military member who took an oath to support and defend the US Constitution above all else (which we are never released from), it's tough to keep silent when the Bill gets misquoted. Shall we just say, for the purpose of this topic, that I do not go by the idea that it's okay for anyone here to own any type or number of guns for any purpose or no purpose?
Another, seemingly conflicting, point is that apparently too many people have the idea that any veteran woth PTSD is liable to go ballistic and start shooting everyone in sight at any moment for no reason whatsoever. This is hardly helped by the fact that disabled vets are given a few benefits by state and federal poclicy, such as discounts on hunting licenses. I don't disagree with the discount, but civilians already freaked by the idea of a vet with PTSD holding a gun can find it frightening. Another facet of this one is the actual or pretended fear of the vet shooting one person anytime there is any conflct with that person. I had that one used on me when an attempt was made to flunk me out of a class due to my disability; it was rather odd to need to explain to police that I do not own a gun and have no permit to carry concealed. It was not necesarry to add that I worry gun ownership may mean I might kill someone without intent before my frontal lobes caught up in a sudden danger situation such as some drunken fool trying to break in after a football game or because he is visiting a friend and got the wrong apartment one dark night. There are other, better ways to deal with that kind of thing, but with PTSD, you have to be realistic about how hair-trigger your responses really are.
If there are places to carry guns and places not to, then a school campus is most definately a place NOT to, in my opinion. What legitamite purpose would be served by having a gun on some of the kids taking classes? None whatsoever. The possible answer to that, that it's their right to carry deadly weapons anywhere they please, is a specious one. No one, anywhere, at any time, should ever carry something which has no purpose other than being a deadly weapon just to say "NYAH!!! I can do this so I am!". And to be brutally frank I have seen far too many kids here and now who are too interested in trying out life without limits away from Mom and Dad for the first time to trust them with guns. Perhaps the politicos need to stop worrying about being "politically correct" and take some serious thought about pros and cons?
Happy Head, can you talk to your Congressman or woman, get some input to some organization that might have some influence on this? Even if noit before the thing is passed, it is always possible to go right ahead and try to get it unpassed too! Teacher safety is certainly a valid concern.
Hope no one is offended by this rather candid tirade!