I have always believed the US AA philosophy is completely wrong. AA isn't that big here in Australia, as its used correctly for only those who have an alcohol addiction, not those who use alcohol to numb pain from something else. Alcohol is not the issue... the person / problem is the issue. Removing alcohol completely only makes issues much much worse, hence why America has all these sober people running around who when they lapse, they do so in a major way, because they fight a craving to relax vs. learn how to drink alcohol responsibly. Very few people are actually biologically addicted to alcohol, as its contents are not addictive like nicotine is.
You must retrain yourself to drink responsibly, to set limits. Australia does exactly this and has far greater success with adults. Teenagers are teenagers, they get drunk and do stupid shit, the binge drink... that is part of being a teenager. When your hitting your late 20's though, you should now be training yourself to drink in moderation vs. totally avoiding it. That only creates another issue. You should never drink straight spirits... that it bad for you. Mix drinks with softdrink, drink light beers, etc. Set realistic and responsible habits, ie. one or two drinks at night to relax, none at any other time. If your going to a licensed premises for lunch or dinner, drink softdrink or have one alcoholic drink only.
This approach across most Western / European countries has proven far better than the US AA method has to date. Its all about responsibility and moderation. Alcohol free days atleast twice a week, etc. Again... never straight spirits though and always moderation. You must train yourself to be responsible.