Dr. Tinnin... this article
This article makes a lot of sense to me. When having craniosacral therapy I had some experiences/feelings relating to immediately-after-birth trauma that were identical to experiences/feelings relating to sexual assault. Not the examples Tinnin gives though. Which would also make sense, because my birth-related trauma was about the medical treatment immediately after, not the birth itself. The sexual assault was different in nature from what he describes too.
In my case, neither was to do with being crushed but both were to do with being handled. I was very aware of the similarities when these came up. Same with the dissociation/splitting. I was aware of the same feeling of trying to fly away.
For me, that reinforced my feeling that craniosacral therapy was the right thing for me to do for all my trauma generally. I didn't have to identify and isolate particular events or memories to work on, as with EMDR - to me that's bringing too much cognition into it plus it risks opening a Pandora's box while working
against our natural safeguards rather than with them. For some aspects of healing, I also feel that talk therapy requires us to intervene too much with thinking and analysis when something else is needed.
Craniosacral work bypasses that and is on the level of the system's natural healing ability. The system orchestrates it, not our minds. In the same way that the system naturally orchestrates the healing of a cut on the hand, and knows what to do when. I was very aware of it working on things that I didn't even remember. I realised that from some of the reactions that are part of the healing process, that I had no idea what they represented.
(Talk therapy and other psychotherapy have helped me also, but in different ways and not with the birth-related stuff other than helping me accept my history and some of the strange experiences of healing it.)