• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Retreat Mode

  • Post starter Post starter Deleted member 1860
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel like he'd stiffen up or punch me. (No offense Anthony... you know I am a big fan and admirer... you are so very candid and I admire that... just my own... hesitancy.)

You once severely underestimated you're sense of purpose or something like that... you though are seriously in my top 5. Butt licking is so not my thing. Just very appreciative for the effort and pains he takes to give a place for us.
 
Yeah, there is sympathy, and there are hugs-a-plenty, but BS and boundary violations are just not tolerated. at least not at this end of the forum. which (IMO) is as things should be.

I'm pretty ambivalent about this thread. When I first started coming here, I was very impressed with Solara. Still am in a lot of ways. not so much in other ways.
 
However, I wonder if those who are teetering on being banned could go on some sort of parole type program where some volunteers have to edit posts before they can be put up by the "parolee". It sounds like a lot of work I know. I realize kismet said some things that are wrong..period. I don't even agree with her on most things, however I feel her pain in her posts and am most sympathetic to power the disease has over her.

I know you didn't address this to me, @Rumors, but I just wanted to respond with a few thoughts.

Threatening death (suicide) is a step beyond what anyone can safely deal with without having training. I believe this very deeply, and I've found it from experience. I struggle with suicide a lot. And I have had a number of failed conversations with crisis workers - people who ostensibly had training, but weren't really up for it. I've also been fortunate enough to get help from people who were very, very good at it.

There is also a difference between threatening suicide and being afraid you will commit suicide. Both are very close to terminal - but when someone is afraid, they are looking for a way other than death, and have the capacity to listen and participate in finding an alternative to suicide. When someone is threatening, they are looking to someone else to provide proof that their life is worthwhile, and do not have much capacity for listening or thinking.

Edit to add: The suicidal person is generally not consciously aware of either statement, above - they also might mix their language with threats and fears, it's an important early assessment to sort out which one is the primary thing going on.

The safest thing for a person actively threatening suicide is intervention. Intervention needs to be in a tangible form - a real person, a real place, real help. The risk of engagement is that you will accidentally wind them up further, especially if you are not the person they are seeking proof from (there is generally a target involved in a threat, sometimes general, often specific). If you can remove them from access to their trigger, safely, they will likely dissolve their intention. Sometimes this just takes having a really, really long conversation with a trained crisis worker, to distract the individual from accessing their trigger long enough so that they either can be moved into intervention or at least contract for safety for a period of time.

In person is more effective than phone; phone is far more effective than text. Text rarely 'clicks' for anything other than encouraging someone to get to a phone, or get to a person for more help.

While someone is in a suicidal state, there are a whole bunch of things they can't do, and a biggie is problem-solve. That's why this:
If you would consider putting her on probation I would offer to be her probation officer...that is actually pretty scary lol...maybe weed out some of the negative thinking styles and figure out how to communicate better and in a less black and white manner?
Isn't really practical for someone who has gotten into a suicidal state, as itskismet did.

I really believe in the rule, here, prohibiting suicidal statements. They are unbelievably upsetting to encounter, and ultimately cannot be dealt with effectively in any way by the forum. A suicidal person needs to hear one voice, be in one dialogue, and be talking to someone with an intimate understanding of the types of suicidal reasoning.

We allow intense suicidal ideation on the forum, and that does help people; having a place where you can write about it without being afraid of getting locked up, being able to hear from others that they have been there, all this is statistically (and practically) therapeutic.

So, that's my ten cents (can't call it two, it's way too long) on why its actually the safest option - for the individual and for the forum - to take a strong stance when someone engages in suicidal posting. Even then, it takes two clearly worded, intentional suicidal posts for someone to automatically be temp-banned.

I appreciate having the space to process this stuff on this thread.
 
I just need to say it... While Anthony may periodically attain godlike status as not only this site's owner but the person who has for the past 10 years made this site both possible and what it is... Admin status doesn't revoke his human-card. He's also a fellow PTSD sufferer, and a damn fine man who has helped each and every single one of us. Yes. He's capable of taking care of himself. It still pisses me the hell off that he can be attacked with impunity. If any of us were attacked in such a way, there is a reasonable expectation that the person doing so will be banned. But if someone attacks Anthony, not only do they get more chances to check their nonsense than any other target they might choose to attack before being called up short, but even after all of the warnings people still leap to the defense of the person attacking him? What the hell? A member of our site was blatantly attacked by another member. Community Constitution, that does not fly. Ever. We depend on staff to call us on our shit if we're out of line. That doesn't give us free range to abuse staff. They aren't our punching bags. We can disagree with staff, debate, even argue... But abusing & attacking them is out of order. They, too, are members of this site and this community. Someone attacking a member isn't tolerated. Except, apparently, when it's Anthony? Makes no damn sense to me. Friday Out.
 
People should not panic too much about such comments directed towards me... I'm very used to them. It is not the first time someone has tried to make me feel guilty that they're going to go kill themselves as a result of being on this site. It won't be the last.

I have a very stringent attitude about suicide, and that is that anyone who does it, does so at their own peril. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is at fault for another committing suicide. Suicide by definition is the act where a person takes their own life. Whilst they obviously aren't in the best place mentally to see any way out, which is tragic in itself, I do not feel responsible if someone has, or does, commit suicide as a result of this website.

To me, that is blaming for a self decision. It's no different than a person walking out of therapy, two days later killing themselves, all because symptoms spike due to the therapy process. The therapist is not at a fault, nor is anyone here in this community, including staff.

My primary concern is to protect staff from this type of blaming, as I have exceptionally rationalised the logic of it, and done so with psychiatrists aid... most staff would not have.

The member was banned for compounding attacks, not just the suicide comments. I try to tolerate PTSD moments from members, we all have them after all, including myself, and I'm no hypocrite, so I try to accept them as just that, PTSD moments. In this instance, attacking, bullying of members, it's all merely surpassed my tolerance.

Kismet is still fine, as she tried to guest post after the fact, though I deleted it as there is no need to continue such conversation.

I would like to thank everyone for their kind words and support, it is appreciated.

As such, I feel it is appropriate to close this thread and we all move onwards and upwards with controlling PTSD.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom