Sometimes you have to relocate to where the jobs are.
Fwiw, this was a line used by John Howard, who was prime minister here in Australia for 10 years (and, somewhat hypocritically, refused to move from his home in Sydney to the prime minister’s official residence in Canberra). He was vocally “move for employment” guy.
And a lot of people did.
The result is now loads of rural towns right across Australia that are struggling to stay relevant. Some towns have been pretty much deserted, and many continue to struggle to function and provide the services that the remaining population need. And most off all, mental health in regional Australia is now appalling. The suicide rates, domestic violence and drug abuse issues are at epidemic levels in many regional areas.
“Move to where the jobs are” effectively means “move to the cities”, and that creates huge changes in the population landscape, and problems that go along with that, don’t get identified, let alone dealt with, till it’s too late.
Move to where the jobs are sounds easy and like a great solution. Not necessarily so, unless there’s planning and funding to meet the needs of those that don’t move, or can’t move (for the myriad reasons that people can’t move, like the high cost or health issues).