Our individual initiations (that no one in their right mind would choose to go through) which got us membership of this not so little but very exclusive club...
really were life changing events, which shattered our personal world views. Even those of us who have had trauma from our earliest days, have still had the experience of realizing that we are not "normal" (whatever "normal" might mean - the DSM and ICD both conspicuously avoid attempting to answer that question).
I think that part of what we sometimes see, is people desperately and angrily trying to cling to a fragment of the wreckage of their former personal certainty, in the face of that being sunk too.
Sometimes the harsh answer could be the correct one; for example:
- a lot of the posts by new members in the supporters forum show signs of co dependent beliefs and behaviours - is it wrong to point that out (or co dependant to do so?)?
- We all need to establish our personal safety and self care - but if we are risking bubblizing ourselves, I'd certainly want to know.
Other times there probably is no correct answer, only shades of more or less confusion and uncertainty. There are multiple paradigms for grouping and interpreting "symptoms", all of these are mental constructs / meta models, which at best, only very approximately represent reality (the same is true in the "harder" sciences, although less extreme than psychology / psychiatry, in many areas, their understandings are far from exact. One of the harder sciences, Geology, has even undergone a radical paradigm shift during my lifetime).
A lot of the "evidence" is biased; drugs companies are very good at funding trials into their new potions. No one is good at funding trials into yoga, mindfulness, fish oil... they therefore remain "unproven".
Unfortunately drugs do not teach coping skills, and often have dangerous side effects, but do earn dividends and pay kickbacks for corrupt policy makers (yeah, I know, redundancy).
Many of the diagnoses are skewed - See the vid I've attached of prof Gabriella Balf talking about this - if the diagnosis is not of a certain level of disorder - the hospital and clinician may not get paid, so it is little wonder what will be diagnosed.
We need to be open minded, but still remain sufficeintly sceptical and critical that our brains don't fall out through the openness.
We all experience cognitive distortions - I'm not going to say "suffer" because some of them can be pleasant - depressed people actually have a less distorted view of reality than none depressed people do. Personally I'd prefer to keep the distortions than be more objective but depressed. The mainstream is full of distorted thinking, look at all of the sacred cows of the mainstream which are identified as abusive here
https://www.myptsd.com/threads/kick-abusers-out-of-your-life-unless-they-are.50874/
Hopefully we'll end up coming out of this as more aware, more compassionate, more resiliant people, with better boundaries. Being angry or snappy in trying to defend a sinking piece of wreckage from our old world view, isn't necessarily going to get us there.
Here's Gabriella Balf, pointing out some of the paradigms and some of the BS
There's also a blog post with links to the other presentations at that conference (they're all good)
https://in2uract.wordpress.com/2014/11/01/nea-bpd-conference-videos-from-2005-through-2013/