Hi Stella,I found the model used in individual therapy (which is very entrenched in behavioral therapy) to be rigid, condescending, infantilizing and actually harmful. Again, this was my experience and I only saw two DBT therapists.
Thanks for the kind input, and sorry that you experience harmful therapy
and apologies to Crowfeather - please say if you'd like me to start a new thread.
In the stuff I'm reading at the moment (Miller, Rathus and Linehan, DBT for suicidal adolescents) it's not meant to be that way. Philosophically, Linehan is a behaviourist, but her experience of conventional CBT / BT, was that her patients were already fed up with being preached at and they found plain vanilla BT to be preachy and invalidating, so they escalated their emotional reactions and didn't stick around.
Can't remember who it was or which conference the video was from. There was a practitioner / researcher who said that in analyses of what feature of DBT it is that makes it effective, where ordinary behavioural therapies fail. It appears to be validation.
People who are highly suicidal are used to being invalidated, and when suddenly, they meet someone who validates, that yes, I believe that you really do feel that, and there is good reason for why you do... it seems to be a game changer.
The Ts are also supposed to stay dialectical rather than slip into becoming judgemental.
The use of DBT for BPD arose from the big overlap between people who are highly suicidal and people diagnosed with BPD, or have 3 or more BPD traits (people with 1 BPD trait had more in common with the general population - 3 traits, had more in common with full blown BPD). The original intention was to treat suicidal folks.
Thanks again.
@