The discussion in this thread has disturbed and upset me some what. If someone without a mental illness or any trauma in their background said to someone with PTSD "Oh we all know what PTSD is like - everyone has suffered panic and anxiety over public speaking!" Everyone on this forum would scream down the house, but that is what the level of responses feels like to me in this thread (up until I came and read a few of the newer responses a short time ago). If a person with PTSD then tried to clarify that no this is not accurate and then was told they were twisting that the person was saying about everyone understanding what PTSD is like (because they are "triggered" into anxiety over public speaking) was being dishonourable and putting words into their mouths because they don't want to hear that what they think PTSD is is not true - on this forum at least, that would be seen as very unfair. Being minimised doesn't feel good, especially when it is such a crucial issue that determines whether potential clients live or die. No one gets to put other people's lives at risk by being a "bad professional". Sure there are plenty of careers you can go and be mediocre and not so good, but that is not an ethical option within this profession. People seeking therapy are not consumers that can assess whether therapy is good like buying a particular brand of plasma TV. They are human beings whose lives are to respected and cared for, and not put at risk by other people's self indulgence or inability to face up to the truth, or be in some way sacrificed so that other people can follow their dreams or try a new career.
If a neurosurgeon has a car accident and works really hard on his recovery, will he be allowed to operate, because of all his hard work on his recovery despite getting tremours randomly but twice a month? Would you want a neurosurgeon to operate you or your loved one? I personally wouldn't. If a pilot develops epilepsy should he be able to fly 747s anymore? No, because it would be put people at unacceptable risk. What is the difference in this case? That it makes us feel good to support anyone following "their dreams?".
And
@Hashi is right, given the prevailing opinion that PTSD is not curable, what is the hell is this discussion about? Is it because we have PTSD and have suffered so much we are entitled to put other people at risk because as we all know there are bad professionals in every profession? Seriously? I don't get it. We have PTSD, better than anyone we should know that inappropriate treatment can have catastrophic effects on fellow sufferers, even cost some their lives.
Even if someone is at the point of appearing okay but not being able to meet someone's needs for a therapist then they are replicating childhood emotional neglect - which is toxic for some one coming from a Complex Trauma background. It is like parents that look good to the community but are actually not there for their children. There are so many levels to it. I have seen the psychologists/psychiatrists/therapists whose own issues have cost their clients their lives. And I have heard the discussion from their peer professionals who despaired at the time. I don't know why as a community we have such a blind spot about this.
It is like a type of magical thinking that we will all get to a point with our PTSD that we can do anything we want, and for some people in some cases, that will be so, but people need to experiment for the next phase of their life in an arena that will not do so much harm if they cannot keep it together. But that doesn't mean people won't have fulfilling and challenging lives. And it doesn't mean that many, many people underestimate their abilities on this forum - or they should settle for less. But you don't get to jeopardise other people's lives.
I think that just blindly supporting people is not always the right thing to do, and is in fact dangerous, immoral and unethical at times. How would anyone like their child, vulnerable family member or someone suicidal go to a therapist who was not really, truly and fully there for their clients but was instead there to meet their own needs by "being able to help others?". Once someone you know has lost their life due to someone who should not have been in the profession to begin with, I think there would be a sincere reversal of opinion.