I'm sorry for that
@Panda Bear . No words. :(
Out here, 'terminal' is not likely to be the sole determining criteria. Actually, unlikely, though that's how it began. Let's put it this way, it's on the table to expand inclusion for qualifying, greatly.
But, what about those who have no one? I suppose it's a rhetorical question, in so far as when you don't there's no who really would know/ or care, either way. But who or how can anyone who is not affected, judge when they don't contribute to the solution? (Not speaking of family, etc, but others.)
What was your turning point
@chrissym ?
I guess what I find hard to wrap my mind around, is being intimately aware and involved (on both sides, sufferer & caregiver of others) with ptsd, cancer, palliative care,. planned (by natural means) death at home, dementia etc., I can only say the ptsd causes more emotional suffering or daily distress +/or pain than for example cancer, unless very advanced, and for example complications from say Diabetes can cause more issues than cancer, even when not palliative. But most people don't question assisted death for palliative cases, but many palliative people far outlive their prognosis, & I can say the ones I care for have a better quality of life than I do, in many respects, they are loved, safe, physical pain managed,cared for, relatively little emotional distress relative to the gravity of their diagnosis, & their needs met (less stress, fear).