People want to fake PTSD, huh? They can have mine any time, with all the "benefits", lol.
I tried to find the thread you're talking about and insted found a paper in the General Hospital Psychiatry journal that summarizes guidelines for distinguishing malingerers from true PTSD sufferers. I was surprised, there is a lot that an informed diagnostician can go on, even though, it must be a really tough call. If I was a doctor, I would always err on the side of believing the patient out of fear that I'd let down someone who really needs the help.
There seems to be a lot that outright liers get wrong: their symptoms are stagnant with no positive development over time, they exagerrate and are overly eager to start sharing things that stink of textbook examples, strike false notes, present accounts contradictory to the events as reported by other sources, blame others, seek treatment in the context of litigation and make themselves sound like heros in the events they are describing. They also get the flashbacks wrong, exagerrate one type of symptoms, while denying two others. On the other hand, the article claims, that people who have other psychiatric illness, but claim PTSD or people who had PTSD, but have already recovered, are very hard to figure out.
Doctors and VA's aside, I don't see how you can fake PTSD with someone who has it if you haven't experienced it. Do you think thats really possible?
Here's the article info. It's copyrighted and I accessed it through my institution's subscription, so I can't post it on a public forum. Plus I don't know if that would be such a good thing anyway, given that it could end up the number one hit on google for how to avoid detection if you're faking PTSD, lol. You can access it your own way, if you care to read it, but its really mainly useful for diagnosticians.
Malingering of PTSD: forensic and diagnostic considerations, characteristics of malingerers and clinical presentations General Hospital Psychiatry - Volume 28, Issue 6 (November 2006) - Copyright © 2006 Elsevier