@brat17
I Very much appreciate your thorough explanation on how you viewed the thread.
I'm going to clarify my position in a way I was trying to avoid for a variety of reasons here.
I work in the legal field, it's not my favorite thing to be doing, and it's one of the reasons that I'm not particularly happy at this time in my life. I wish I had gone back to get my nursing license updated years ago instead. I'm not thrilled with how I spend my days, I've just gone back to work this week.
My experience with attorneys is both personal and professional, I've been in a position to only afford lousy representation and I've also had in house business attorneys for managing LLC's at a previous time in my life. I've socialized with attorneys... and I've sued a couple for malpractice and won. ( not my friends )
For some reason, and I'm hoping you don't take this personally. The circumstances I described a situation that pro bono consultations would be expected, as well as the type of attorneys you'd want to give them to you, have been mostly over looked by the people reading my posts.
I have also never heard of a divorce attorney giving free consultations, by the way.
I agree with everything you're saying and don't doubt a word of it. The divorce attorney is the most reviled creature in the court room, the rule is always whoever has access to the most legal fees wins. The ability to hide assets is not even a challenge if they know you can't afford a forensic accountant to officially track it and present it to a judge. I'm sorry you had a bad experience also. My own case involved complicated international businesses and I just had to walk away.
I get disgusted when I see what should be straight forward situations get muddled here, because one party has the money to drag things out and muddle them.
Suing an attorney for malpractice is almost always a waste of time for the same reasons, they'll bleed out your resources until you cant fight with meaningless motions and delays. They're bullies, they also protect their own. Don't think the drug addict lawyers aren't playing golf with the rest of them, they have each others backs out of the court room. In my case there was such in your face egregious malpractice that it was actually a slam dunk, the attorneys settled out of court to keep the worst of it off their record. That's unusual, and one was an addict, which isn't unusual.
I think this thread hit a nerve with some people because a lot of us here have been victims in situations where we needed to deal with attorneys. It's a loaded topic for a lot of people. The amount of money they charge is the main reason that people get so passionate about their opinions. I think it's ironic that this started with an attorney being outraged I suggested someone should get a free half hour in any circumstances. It was hard for me to hold back what my actual experience is, but at this point I have already put myself in a position to where if someone familiar with me joins this site, they'll be able to figure out who I am. I'm not comfortable with that, but I have to let it go.