- Thread starter
- #13
brokenpony
Confident
yeah okay i understand. so it is definitely based on presentation over time and not definite diagnosis yet (but i think “DD unspecified” or whatever is now on my chart). like after 2ish years of working she started discussing disssociative disorders more generally with me and her description of her experience was like that, that she experiences me in this way and has not understood why, and that was why she was considering the diagnosis. she has had DID clients but they were more overt in it and she is not an expert and is consulting with a specialist and seeking out more training currently.My opinion, treat the symptoms that are happening. If your dissociation is this disruptive, then going back to your core identity and attachment is not a bad idea.
You said that your therapist said you've been "switching in sessions" - to me this is a red flag, especially if she hasn't actually assessed you for DID (since she would not know if you were switching or not). Her saying "this is my experience of working with you, and your demeanor has changed throughout sessions" would be different than her saying "yeah so you're definitely switching all the time" which is why I brought it up.
If it was more like the former, then that is not as big of an issue. The reason I mention it is because this is a pretty controversial diagnosis, and if your therapist is not a specialist in DID it is easier for her to overstep. I would do some research into iatrogenic illnesses - that is, when patients are prescribed their disorders by therapists instead of assessed based on presentation, and wind up adopting symptoms that they ordinarily wouldn't have.
That way you'll have a better understanding of whether your therapist is behaving normally. You could also share this concern with your therapist and gauge her response. A healthy therapist would help you work through that.
thanks, i’m sorry, i am just constantly ruminating on her and whether i can trust her because of what happened to me so you just hit a trigger point. i never feel like she is abusing me like he did, but i do at times worry she will harm me with good intentions, like how do i know she knows what she’s doing and isn’t messing me up worse. i feel like after what happened i can’t trust myself at all to do the right thing for myself so therapy is complicated.Sorry, not the intention. Was really just reflecting off the way you’d initially described it, but your latest post sounds very different.
In terms of how to get started with internal communication, that’s going to depend in part on the degree of awareness that your parts have of each other. But however you approach it? Go really slow.
If you do have alters, and they have been coexisting without awareness of each other, that degree of compartmentalising has been serving a protective purpose. Typically, the early stages of communication with alters is incredibly destabilising, because you’re removing the protective factor of keeping parts that operate in isolation together, often in circumstances where they are structured in direct conflict with each other.
Short version? Initial communication is very often destabilising. It will take time for your different parts to feel safe with each other. It may be helpful to create a safe internal space, with clear boundaries about acceptable interaction, before allowing parts to start communicating with each other.
i think i will just try to talk to her more about worrying about iatrogenic effects. part of my apprehension about really engaging with the “others” is that i am worried about what you guys are saying, that i can’t trust myself to know if what i am experiencing is real or not or misperception and that any evidence is imagined and false and me overreacting to what for everyone else human is normal.