@Fadeaway, I hope that you'll find the kind of safety you need. Also I was thinking, would there be any safer psychiatric hospital you /could/ go to? Or combined in-patient/out-patient program? It sounds hospitalization'd be likely to mess you up more, but I was wondering if short time stay (days range) or combination of psychiatric care wouldn't be doable.
Is there any rape/crisis center anywhere near you that you could go to, or at least call when in time of emergency? Or women's shelters?
@Solara, I don't necessarily think
@FridayJones is victim blaming here, or defending an abuser. What was shared is in some cases, to secure physical security of a person *is* priority, *however* achieved, is achievement. Is needed, nobody was saying good or first choice thing. Just that to an outside observer, partner included, what's immediately needed in the situation? May be darn difficult to figure, if unprepared for it.
And then there's difference in intent. The effect on the held person may be the same. But intent to harm them? Totally may not be there. To assume plain black and white that intent is there, is too simplistic.
May be difference in experience, though. I'm just not thinking it's helpful to judge every restriction as abusive, and with intent to be so. I've been in situations people keeping me with them, were keeping me from getting hurt worse. Via my own reactions or others. And I'm damned grateful they've done it. Pleasant, it wasn't. But that *isn't* a priority when staying alive is. Caring for the life of another *IS* care. Let's not pretend otherwise. Because it implies concern for life is nothing.
That said, I'm sorry for situations where the situation is bad, settings are bad, and people involved in it basically trapped, even arising.