joeylittle
Sponsor
Note to Colleagues: Please Stop Saying Post Traumatic Stress Is Incurable | The Huffington Post
It's interesting. Important to note it was written in 2010, updated in 2011. As @StormySea points out, the author (it's a blog piece) uses cureable and manageable and treatable all interchangeably - so they clearly don't value the detail in the distinction. She's a psychotherapist who lists herself as a 'guided imagery innovator', and the thrust of the thing is really as simple as: hey, try guided imagery!
She writes:
She does, however, endorse EMDR.
I'd just call the whole thing an interesting glimpse into where some of the thinking in the field was, five years ago - but she makes some really odd claims about the neuropathology of PTSD. My favorite is that all trauma is stored in a pre-verbal way initially, and that people who are capable of talking about their trauma most likely will never develop PTSD. Things that make you go "hmmmm" :O_o:
I was glad to go looking for the article, though, because I came upon this really well-written piece specifically talking about the relationship of the PTSD symptom called a sense of a foreshortened future/impending doom, and suicidal ideation. I started a thread here: Deconstructing The Relationship Between Ptsd And Suicidal Thinking, for anyone interested.
In other words - it's all good.
It's interesting. Important to note it was written in 2010, updated in 2011. As @StormySea points out, the author (it's a blog piece) uses cureable and manageable and treatable all interchangeably - so they clearly don't value the detail in the distinction. She's a psychotherapist who lists herself as a 'guided imagery innovator', and the thrust of the thing is really as simple as: hey, try guided imagery!
She writes:
You can recover from posttraumatic stress. Certainly, you can significantly reduce - not just manage - its symptoms. But - and here’s the thing - not with traditional treatment. The problem is, a lot of my colleagues don’t know this yet. So they go about it in traditional ways and pronounce the condition incurable, based on the results they get.
She does, however, endorse EMDR.
I'd just call the whole thing an interesting glimpse into where some of the thinking in the field was, five years ago - but she makes some really odd claims about the neuropathology of PTSD. My favorite is that all trauma is stored in a pre-verbal way initially, and that people who are capable of talking about their trauma most likely will never develop PTSD. Things that make you go "hmmmm" :O_o:
I was glad to go looking for the article, though, because I came upon this really well-written piece specifically talking about the relationship of the PTSD symptom called a sense of a foreshortened future/impending doom, and suicidal ideation. I started a thread here: Deconstructing The Relationship Between Ptsd And Suicidal Thinking, for anyone interested.
It's a thing that happens - the more you learn about your own diagnosis, the more important the distinctions can become. Sometimes we can appear to go nuts splitting hairs over the language that gets used - I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing, or something you should feel badly about. At the end of the day, anything that is empowering is helping. Whether that's knowing the diagnostic criteria like the back of your hand, having strong opinions about where the research is (and isn't), investing in debates about what it's really like vs. how it's sometimes described...I believe that's all a part of taking ownership of the diagnosis, which will eventually help you take ahold of the condition itself.This thread has shown me how important semantics can be!
In other words - it's all good.