- Post starter
- #25
@shimmerz ,
I watched all three, I'd just intended to dip in, but got absolutely hooked. There are short comings, the economics reasoning was at best semi literate, with absolutely no reference to "regulatory capture" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture or to the problems of "economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth" (aka "the calculation problem" the wikipedia entry for this seems to be pretty chaotic at the moment) .
I was having a good chuckle while agreeing with the part about the "Stockholm Syndrome", especially after my criticism of the opening text.
A really good set of films. Thanks.
I watched all three, I'd just intended to dip in, but got absolutely hooked. There are short comings, the economics reasoning was at best semi literate, with absolutely no reference to "regulatory capture" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture or to the problems of "economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth" (aka "the calculation problem" the wikipedia entry for this seems to be pretty chaotic at the moment) .
I was having a good chuckle while agreeing with the part about the "Stockholm Syndrome", especially after my criticism of the opening text.
A really good set of films. Thanks.
The films brought that out quite clearly, and described the opportunity cost, of time lost while people are not feeling, and then, when they finally get off them, (one person described 7 to 9 months of withdrawal) having to learn how to cope with living and caring again, and to begin to deal with all of the sh!te that got them put on the happy pills in the first place.It wasn't until I started to take control when I realised medication was hurting me more than helping me, stopped it, and suddenly I could feel things and get on with what needed attention.
Last edited: