• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

News The Lastest News Report On Ptsd Has Me Seeing Red

Status
Not open for further replies.
I watched this and really see this as an attempt to monopolize on the medical conditions of others for his personal profit. An author wanting to promote his book because he has an educated certificate that says he is to be publicly trusted as a professional and his work should be purchased because he is documented as expert. That is all I heard in this interview.

He offers no defining defintions of PTS or PTSD than what we can not already find on the Internet for ourselves even if not affilated with PTS or PTSD personally. Medical professionals with or without criteria to treat PTS or PTSD and diagnose all have one agenda in common anyways and that is to take our monies.

Until we start taking the advice, social definitions and majority acceptance and creating our own educated resources of what works for us and does not, all we do is keep a frenzy going on about who is right or wrong and fueling the medical controversies behind the medical professionals pockets.

These types of controversies and this author's intention is only to gain profits for him self and those affialited with him. It is not for the care of no one but his common interest seekers of financial gain. Subliminal messaging at it's finest by targeting individuals who have these disorders.

This is supreme capitalizing on medical conditions. Profits for medical insurance companies who can limit or restrict coverage to individuals with PTS or PTSD. It is a marketing gimic and nothing more by a very composed and intelligent doctor who found a topic to make a dollar off of and to add his two cents to an already complicated medical world of PTS and PTSD definition, treatment, and to the confusion of accurate diagnosis and adding to the confusion of PTS and PTSD sufferers prompting many to buy his book.

It does not change the symptoms for PTS or PTSD sufferers. It does not change who is affected by PTS or PTSD. It does explain why some are more subjected to PTSD than others and it does not offer relief to no one but his monetary bank roll he is trying to grow.

I only watched it because I read the comments here and wanted to see for myself what the deal was about. This is only my opinion on it and no, I will not buy nor read his book. I learn from other's who actually know and have been there and from their experiences. We are all forced experts of PTS or PTSD because we had no choice that we were subjected to traumas that our mind and bodies could not process efficiently or effectively. Any disorder that disrupts routine of a person's ability to function and cope through normal stresses in life is a disorder or illness to me.

Sleep deprivation is my biggest problem with PTSD because of the lack and quality of sleep I have with nightmares, terrors and the inability for my body to rest as it should. Anxieties that I can not control nor explain are my biggest problems. These two issues limit my daily routines to follow any specific schedules.

I am limited to taking medications because they can have adverse reactions increasing seizures in me. When I was in my 20s, my body and brain was like on speed and youthful enough that I could follow routine, handle the stresses and function in a job. As time goes on my body, my brain, and my mind know the limitations that I have to work through to sustain my health. For any person to say they are a professional and try to classify all individuals in the same category as this is ridiculous.

We share disturbing symptoms. We share different therapies. But we can not share the same "this will work for all" mentality of standardized treatments because each of us have PTSD for different reasons with different effects to our mind, brains, and bodies. Until research is done on the brain, central nervous system, chemical imbalance and electrolyte fluctations that occur with PTS or PTSD we are no closer to finding out who is more prone to these disorders than others and how to treat them.

I disagree that PTSD or PTS should be announced publicly as beneficial to the people who have it. This is misleading and guiding building stigma to society. This is horrible and in bad judgment. Many of us who have became mature or wiser in our conditions is not because of a choice we had but because we were forced to deal with the things we could not control and our minds and body could not properly process the information or trauma given to us. This only adds to the stigma and public ignorance of PTS and PTSD.

This "news" was a huge disguise of subliminal messaging for profit. Nothing more. Until we start reading between the lines of what we read and see on television, we'll believe anything and buy anything.
 
I just wanted to add something to this real quick. Bear with me. My initial knee jerk reaction was to be angry. This is easy today, since (like most days) my cup is full. However, I took a different step towards it, looked at it and watched it again- objectively this time.

It is true actually, that PTSD is over diagnosed. Anthony posted the statistics, and I happen to agree with that completely as it is actual evidence and not just opinion. I agree with Anthony on the fact that there is a clear and distinct difference between a psychologist and a psychiatrist- as the level of education is vastly differing. A pyschologist only needs to have an undergraduate (or masters degree) and does not have a medical degree nor has he been in medical school, while a Psychiatrist has attended medical school and has earned a Ph.D (or in most cases higher, as in MD or more than one of either). It is not neccessarily about the number of years spent in education as much as what type of education they have actually attained that makes one more capable of rendering an accurate diagnosis than the other.

But in regards to this specific video- I had to digress and look at it differently. First of all, it is an interview. And we can not forget that interviews are not unbiased. If this were a scene in a court room a lawyer would have stood up a half a dozen times to object and state that the reporter was leading the "witness". That is what journalsim is. Twist the words out of him to get the story the reporter wants. Once the words are out there, he can not neccessarly back peddle or he looks like a fool (which he winds up doing regardless). So he sticks to his guns, keep going on with what he said and moves forward, with the reporter leading him in order to form their own version of the story. That is journalism at its best (or worst rather)- and that is how it works.

If anything, I hope that interviews like this whether agreeable or disagreeable, bring to light the need for reform in obtaining the diagnosis- regardless of what the trauma that developed PTSD actually was.
 
Interesting because I don't trust a Psychiatrist here in US as much as I would trust a Psychologist. Besides that if we only accepted diagnosis from a Psychiatrist, it would go under diagnosed. Who stands to gain the most from a misdiagnosis? Exactly.
I'm more interested in my own recovery than the very definition of ptsd, it has already proven to be a ridiculous task obviously to adequately define. We have a wide spectrum of symptoms and criteria, different experiences, different trauma, different definitions of trauma. It is all stupid and I have had enough of it all. I bet determining the shape of the freaking universe will be easier.

Maybe someone down the line thought that if they treated them all like they had ptsd that they would all be cured, except for those with actual ptsd as they would only get 'better' but not cured. They didn't factor in the fact that there are a lot of people out there who 'want' ptsd?? *shrug* Ptsd isn't a diagnosis but a phenomenon?? This is where we are at with this? Forget it. Just focus on yourself really. What a disaster.

This is not being approached in the right way because a large population is trying to fit a mold that is ptsd. As far as I am concerned criteria should not include a cause since that includes a number of instances that are not finite in nature. How can somebody have all the symptoms forever but not meet the criteria just because they weren't a soldier or a rape victim? You thought the place you live in is bad? What about what goes on around the world, especially in less fortunate countries? This is far more a part of our humanity than people might know.

My frustration here is a reflection of the confusion going on here between professionals ability to properly educate in a definitive way on how to diagnose what is ptsd. What the hell???
 
I think what he had to say had a lot of validity - when he had the chance to get a word in edgewise. He wasn't saying anything new about PTSD, but I'm not sure that he had any kind of a chance to present his case better.

The journalist was aggressively trying to push her own agenda, which was to look like a beautifully groomed expert on every subject, and get a reaction out of him. That's what Fox News does. It specialises in outrage and conspiracy.:p

The equivalent in the UK would be the Daily Mail, which I will admit to looking at surreptitiously.:oops:

Both news outlets sort of serve the same purpose as public hangings used to.:rolleyes:
 
And in a bizarre coincidence, this was in today's Daily Mail...shhh, don't tell anyone that I was reading it.;).

[DLMURL]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2094134/Trauma-Good-says-psychologist-helped-survivors-Zeebrugge-disaster.html[/DLMURL].
 
ok, I looked at the article too. When I read the title and I immediately thought 'grrrr'. But then I read the article. I did not appreciate the lack of information of negative effects of trauma- the (somewhat) disregard for those who were indeed having problems- but I did agree with some of what was said.

The examples given about the mindset that changes following a trauma or an illness- this also coincides with the fact that those who suffer from anxiety disorders in post trauma can go on to live normal healthy lives, and warrants the minimum 9 months for the PTSD diagnosis. I have seen it in myself with illness, and in loved ones who suffered from illness. It is the ability to appreciate life with a different outlook. As if it is a reminder of what it means to 'stop and smell the roses'- to live better and fuller because of the experience of not knowing if you would have the chance to continue to do so.

Still, the title is grrrrrr.
 
I read what this woman wrote about the relationship between trauma and psychological growth a couple of years ago - it's very similar to what the Nottingham guy writes without getting into the PTS/PTSD argument.


Lisa Butler, PhD
Associate Professor of Social Work
University at Buffalo


Butler, an expert who researches trauma, says that people who live through an extreme traumatic experience such as the 9/11 terrorist attacks often have the capacity to bounce back or even grow in their appreciation of life, the closeness of their relationships, or their sense of efficacy to meet such challenges, among other things. Most people recover well following devastating events, and even among those who struggle with the experience, many of them can find some benefit from the experience, despite the negative effects of the event in their lives, she says.

“Even when people go through a horrible life-threatening event or endure huge losses and very difficult circumstances, many of them can find some positive aspects to the experience and are able to grow from it.” says Lisa D. Butler, associate professor in the School of Social Work, whose multiple studies on the trauma following 9/11 and other severely disruptive life events have been published in numerous professional journals, including the April 2009 issue of The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

“Finding some meaning or benefit in the experience does not negate the pain of what they have been through or the lingering effects in their lives, by any means,” Butler says.

But, she says, "it can be heartening and empowering to find something positive in the bad that has happened.”
 
Advice if I may?: Turn off Fox: voted near unanimously as the most UN scientific channel ever devised. Yes, I've gotten it that mine is not "real" PTSD cause I'm civilian... till same combat vet got the whole load of my trauma story that shook him up... bad. I don't, and won't share that here... only for someone close if they dare. There are more wars going on in the world (and within our own country) than I like to think about lest the racing thoughts thing get going... against gangs, religions, drugs and the "culture war" that has brought on the likes of "Occupy". Fox news would love to resurrect Patton and his glove-smacking attitude... so it seems to me. Thanx for the link but choose not to watch anything Faux vomits up.
 
Personally, my experience with private psychiatry and psychology (in England!) has given me huge benefits. I have learnt to cope better, I have learnt new skills, I have better understanding of myself, others and my environment, and that is very valuable to me. I am an enhanced version of me because of the treatment I have received.

I think the journalist did a very poor job in the interview because of her lack of understanding of PTSD resulted in her using generalisations - she did not do her homework. She repeatedly associated PTSD with War Veterans - this is where it was first labelled with war veterans that were exposed, for a long period (years) to traumatic war events. However, it is not a disorder of war alone, if it was it would be called PWSD, not PTSD. So lets not get upset about the generalisations the uneducated want to use to explain the condition.

I think the point Prof Stephen Joseph is making is that PTSD (with the disorder) is more serious than an isolated incident that DOES NOT result in SERIOUS debilitation and loss of ability to function in life. PTS is different to the PTSD (with disorder) because of an individual's ability to recover QUICKLY from that trauma, without having a significant and long-term impact on their ability to cope in life.

Prof Joseph is not saying that ongoing life traumatic experiences are not PTSD (with the disorder part). He is not saying that only military people have PTSD (with the disorder). He IS saying that not every traumatic situation results in the PTSD (with disorder) that the people here experience. Those that have had a trauma or stressful experience will be affected by the experience but may not end up with the 'Disorder'.

He is not saying that you can 'just get over PTSD'. What he is saying is that there hope for recovery from the Anxiety/Stress Disorder induced by a traumatic experience (PTS) and, if the patient is willing, PTSD (with the disorder) can recover - in the sense of coping better by looking to the future YOU want and changing your situation to give you that future by prioritising what is important to you.

It is about giving ourselves a new meaning, direction and purpose in life and making the choice to live a life that is 'better' for us. That is one that we want for ourselves and not the reality thrown upon us by others who have traumatised us or by fearing loosing our lives (PTSD is provoked by a serious threat to life and living).

There is really nothing new in these ideas (philosophy about better living has been around for decades). People get so caught up in what life has dealt and the treadmill life style that makes us miserable, that they forget that they have the power to control and change their future for the better and the way they want it. We cannot change the past but we can change our future, if we choose to.

Recovery is all about putting these traumas in the past and re-defining our view on the past, what we want in future and living our lives. Not a new concept, and difficult to appreciate when you are unwell, but vital......

It is time to make our own future regardless of our past....

PS, ooxx
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom