I watched this interview yesterday. I found it quite interesting, but more from the point of view that there was very little to support the argument that the use of Seroquel in the treatment of PTSD isn't appropriate:
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2013/s3744902.htm
Thoughts anyone?
It seems to me that the two soldiers who were undergoing treatment may well have been over-medicated based on how they were feeling, but the opinion of the medical professional interviewed, who suggests that the use of Seroquel for the treatment of PTSD is an "indicator of poor quality treatment" just doesn't sit right with me.
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2013/s3744902.htm
Thoughts anyone?
It seems to me that the two soldiers who were undergoing treatment may well have been over-medicated based on how they were feeling, but the opinion of the medical professional interviewed, who suggests that the use of Seroquel for the treatment of PTSD is an "indicator of poor quality treatment" just doesn't sit right with me.