Hi all.
Here's where I stick my neck out. Anthony or someone else may jump all over me for this...
I might get howled down, but I do not like the fact that they ask about specifics of incidents. I don't think anyone has the right to stir up a person's incidents outside of a session where the resultant re-stimulation is not going to be professionally handled.
Take a hundred people. They will have say, from one to 100 traumatic events - from infancy, young childhood, teenage years, adult ones of assault, abuse or from a battleground or many. Every incident is unique, different content, different somatics, different length, different circumstances, different background experience, different state of mind at the time (strong, vulnerable, healthy, sick) and you've got symptoms being generated from these, maybe hyper vigilance from this one or half a dozen, nightmares are usually replaying another particular one and so on.
Yet, they are all the same: all contain physical and/or emotional pain, unresolved, painful, wretchedly bloody horrible. And in my opinion, nobody's business outside of a professional session. It is this preoccupation with the details of the content of the traumas and the differences that takes our attention away from their common ground, the fact that they hurt, they did damage and they happened. It would be like treating sunstroke by asking endless questions about the angle of the sun, time of day, surrounding features, what you were wearing,who you were with an what you thinking about... Sorry guys, I think they are floundering and clutching at straws. The answers to how to treat traumas has never been found IN the traumas and never will. Techniques and modalities will be anything from unhelpful to very helpful. Lets test 'em and give them an honest go, but rummaging around in a million significances will lead nowhere and only succeed in causing upset with no therapeutic (or research) gain. : O )
Here's where I stick my neck out. Anthony or someone else may jump all over me for this...
I might get howled down, but I do not like the fact that they ask about specifics of incidents. I don't think anyone has the right to stir up a person's incidents outside of a session where the resultant re-stimulation is not going to be professionally handled.
Take a hundred people. They will have say, from one to 100 traumatic events - from infancy, young childhood, teenage years, adult ones of assault, abuse or from a battleground or many. Every incident is unique, different content, different somatics, different length, different circumstances, different background experience, different state of mind at the time (strong, vulnerable, healthy, sick) and you've got symptoms being generated from these, maybe hyper vigilance from this one or half a dozen, nightmares are usually replaying another particular one and so on.
Yet, they are all the same: all contain physical and/or emotional pain, unresolved, painful, wretchedly bloody horrible. And in my opinion, nobody's business outside of a professional session. It is this preoccupation with the details of the content of the traumas and the differences that takes our attention away from their common ground, the fact that they hurt, they did damage and they happened. It would be like treating sunstroke by asking endless questions about the angle of the sun, time of day, surrounding features, what you were wearing,who you were with an what you thinking about... Sorry guys, I think they are floundering and clutching at straws. The answers to how to treat traumas has never been found IN the traumas and never will. Techniques and modalities will be anything from unhelpful to very helpful. Lets test 'em and give them an honest go, but rummaging around in a million significances will lead nowhere and only succeed in causing upset with no therapeutic (or research) gain. : O )