eah, all good points about gun legislation. But other First World countries manage it. Why can't we?
Fully automatic weapons were banned on May 19, 1986. They have continued to be banned, sometimes by narrow votes, but often with increasing strictures, ever since.
They have been illegal to purchase, make, or own -by private citizens aka excepting police & military- for over 25 years.
They're ALREADY illegal. Every time tragedy strikes, though, the argument comes up to ban them. Even though they already are. We cannot legislate crime. We can only punish it.
It might be noted that they were initially banned in 1935. The laws were a little too specific, back then, as they were targeting tommy guns & similar. So more and more laws have been added over the years. The public has always been behind limiting weapons of mass casualty to military & police, only. It's not a new concept. Much as we may wish it were. IE, something terrible has happened, change the laws & it won't happen again. It's a self defense mechanism similar to victim blaming.
How can we stop this??? Is a natural/rational thought process. Whether it's massacres or rape. Make it illegal, is clearly the first step. But that seems to be where we stop. It already is illegal. Has been illegal. For a long time. Thinking has to move beyond making crime illegal. Murder is illegal. Fully automatic weapons are illegal. Both just happened. So where do we go from there? And how far are we willing to go from there? It's a difficult question.