I am happy with the diagnose because it does explain a lot of what I went, and I’m going, through.
Before it it’s not as if I did not know I hadn’t trauma and maladaptive patterns that formed around the specifics of my situation, but I wasn’t aware of the difference of crit A traumas and what we casually call trauma.
It gave me space to think of my behaviour through this lens, in more technical terms, and understand that a lot of the struggle I was having was actually hypervigilance and dissociation, and that there is a neurological foundation to it, it isn’t just me wanting attention. I didn’t recognize myself in these things before even knowing they existed because I knew many people in critical mental health conditions.
Being subclinical or subcritical to me was equal to function, was equal to I can go f*ck myself somewhere else with my little problems. Except that trying to throw myself off a bridge in a fit of rage isn’t exactly subcritical and the rest, while subcritical, isn’t good. And something that isn’t good is bad enough to be taken care of. Basically my only criterion was YEA BUT AT LEAST I’M NOT DYING AINT I. Which I also discovered to be stupidly PTSDesque, this binary thing, my ways of treating things for myself were life/death, okay/kaput, fix it/screw it. Not for others, but for myself. Don’t get me wrong I was nuanced to describe things etc, but just not to assess gravity, having any sense of comfort or correctness apart okay/not okay.
So since I was diagnosed, I’m capable to see I progressed a lot. And for this I’m really happy.
And yes I’m a bit annoyed to see everything can be a trauma, everyone is "traumatized"… but actually I prefer this than having a world where nothing is worth complaining about or trying to find sense. Where dust off and f*cking walk is your go-to option even if you’re bleeding since the last 10km. And for the woman with her sidewalk, technically it could be a critA. You can die and perhaps she saw it and envisioned it very clearly, who knows. Now PTSD really tends to develop more with interpersonal violence than with mundane accidents but it isn’t impossible.
And actually, even people who say they’re "traumatized" by a rap song, to take the example of the other thread… if someone has such a strong response to words or lyrics, it might be more than just being sensitive. The rap song isn’t a crit A. But it can trigger responses that once were caused by a crit A, and the person is just all confused and is confusing the consequences for the causes. So it’s very difficult to assess, even what people mean when they say "Oh I got PTSD because I slipped on a sidewalk". It might be the sidewalk is a cover up story for the context of it and being the presentable part of the trauma. It might be it’s literal. It might be that that person wants attention. It might be it’s all of that. On case by case I can’t assess.
What annoys me is the quantity of TW and tone-policing, or trigger warnings on things that are generally just… well not your opinion. The recuperation of the word "triggering" is much more general and problematic I find, because it just sweeps away the difference between activated and triggered. You can get FUBAR triggered over a butterfly or the shape of a teacup. This, no one is capable of placing a TW on it. While certain topics might be activating in general and certain graphic depictions do well deserve to have a warning on it so you don’t have to expose yourself to the details of something you might even already know. I like words to mean what they mean and triggering doesn’t equal problematic or activating. It’s not that far but it isn’t the same. And using one to mean the other fuzzes the original meaning which is problematic. (Triggering for some.

)
Overall I think the general public really would benefit from education about PTSD which is a very prevalent condition among humans. And it’s also so rich in explaining a lot of underlying mechanisms of what we very quickly call madness or stupidity that I find it silly it’s not better known.