This. And some (many) are not very good at *that*--I'm not in any way defending this T, just to be clear. I have come to have very little respect for the professionals we think they are. Yes, they have gone through a lot of training, but if they are unable to get the human part right, the training is--in my opinion--useless.
I felt like there was nothing I could have said to get him to hear what i was saying, he wasn't truly open to listening (i felt flustered and embarrassed because his face was saying 'What you're saying doesn't make sense). It was challenging.
I'm sorry you had this experience. We can't, of course, come to any certain conclusion because none of us was there. But, I feel like this a lot when I bring up things that he is not completely familiar with, and I've come to understand that, while he is listening, he may not be willing to change his point of view.
I just don't think some have the ability to stay open-minded and hear with the idea that maybe it might be a good idea to pursue.
Yes. At the beg of therapy he said not to unless it was for admin. That he would have to delete my emails due to GDPR reasons. Which I don't agree with because if I consent to the emails being sent to him, knowing the risks, there's no GDPR issue.
Is he in private therapy or is he part of a group? It could be, if the latter, that it's a policy of the group. I know lots of Ts who don't even provide an email to clients because they want to be very careful about the privacy issue and the law.
I wonder if you could give him something in writing and keep a copy, so he could destroy that after he was done reading it? Or...give it to him in session, and then discuss?
Where as I'm thinking they came out because a protective mechanism kicked in due to how he handled the situation badly. That didn't feel like a healthy 'coming out' of choice.
Actually, all of the Ts I've seen (I'm DID) believed that any time a part comes out is good. No matter what the reason.
Very easy to put the problem on the person receiving therapy and highlight their coping mechanisms whilst ignoring the therapist's part in it.
Yeah, unfortunately, in my personal experience, most Ts (and all medical doctors) do this. And here, we're just trying to brainstorm a bit as to what he might have meant, 'cause we weren't there.
Which means he won't get my experiences as much as a therapist who does try to understand more specifically about OSDD/DDNOS.
I can't remember if you said--does he say this is something he treats? Because some don't, at all.
don't think he appreciates what I go through between sessions.
Oh, I feel like this, too. And it's possible (I'm thinking of this for me, too) that he doesn't, and it's time to move to someone else if at all possible. I also know the reluctance to do so--the ONLY reason I continue to see mine is because I will NOT see another. I'm far along in my process, though, so I have a lot of tools under my belt to get through.
I still feel he was invalidating because his aim was to prove this guy being wrong, rather than listen to what in that information was important to me and why.
Yes...it would feel invalidating to me, too. It did, in fact, when it happened to me. But I just had to accept that he wasn't going to give on it.
I think I'll have to communicate this. There's so much he doesn't know because I was dissociated and didn't speak.
This sounds like a great idea! How he responds may help you see where he is in his thinking and make a decision moving forward.