Ecdysis
Diamond Member
Okay, so maybe I'm going to be the last person in the class to have understood this... 
Maybe this is classic PTSD and everyone gets it except me... until today... sigh...
Until now, my model of understanding trauma has been that this awful-harrowing-overwhelming-unbearable thing happens... And then with PTSD, over the years, you get these fainter "echoes" of the actual trauma...
Today I had an aha moment, where I think that model often doesn't apply to me, or probably to many others.
Often, in the moment of trauma, I numbed out, dissociated, just focussed on surviving/ getting out of there... So the actual experience, while obviously distressing and overwhelming... was emotionally kind of... numb? muted? eerily calm?
And then later, what I get is not some "faint echo" of the traumatic event... Rather, later ALLLLLL the emotions of terror, rage, helplessness, confusion, panic, sobbing, distress, dysregulation come up...
So that the "later" bit will actually FEEL so much, much worse than the traumatic event did *in the moment where it happened* cos dissociation kicked in so quick and effectively, that it spared me 90% of my feelings in the moment, so that I could focus on the 4 F survival responses: fight/ flee/ freeze/ fawn.
So... sigh... ALL these years, I've been feeling like an utter idiot for being in MORE distress post-trauma than in the moment of trauma... I feel like I've been somehow doing it wrong and that it shouldn't be like that.
And obviously, there will be many, many examples of trauma which do fit that other model - where the moment of trauma FEELS absolutely beyond all limits terrifying and people have the full range of extreme emotions *in the moment*.
But I guess there may be two models - one where the emotions are intense in the moment and then more muted later and also the exact reverse - where the emotions are muted in the moment of trauma and then come out with a vengance, once the danger has passed.
Yeah.. who knew? Probly heaps of people, but I was today years old before I realised it...
Maybe this is classic PTSD and everyone gets it except me... until today... sigh...
Until now, my model of understanding trauma has been that this awful-harrowing-overwhelming-unbearable thing happens... And then with PTSD, over the years, you get these fainter "echoes" of the actual trauma...
Today I had an aha moment, where I think that model often doesn't apply to me, or probably to many others.
Often, in the moment of trauma, I numbed out, dissociated, just focussed on surviving/ getting out of there... So the actual experience, while obviously distressing and overwhelming... was emotionally kind of... numb? muted? eerily calm?
And then later, what I get is not some "faint echo" of the traumatic event... Rather, later ALLLLLL the emotions of terror, rage, helplessness, confusion, panic, sobbing, distress, dysregulation come up...
So that the "later" bit will actually FEEL so much, much worse than the traumatic event did *in the moment where it happened* cos dissociation kicked in so quick and effectively, that it spared me 90% of my feelings in the moment, so that I could focus on the 4 F survival responses: fight/ flee/ freeze/ fawn.
So... sigh... ALL these years, I've been feeling like an utter idiot for being in MORE distress post-trauma than in the moment of trauma... I feel like I've been somehow doing it wrong and that it shouldn't be like that.
And obviously, there will be many, many examples of trauma which do fit that other model - where the moment of trauma FEELS absolutely beyond all limits terrifying and people have the full range of extreme emotions *in the moment*.
But I guess there may be two models - one where the emotions are intense in the moment and then more muted later and also the exact reverse - where the emotions are muted in the moment of trauma and then come out with a vengance, once the danger has passed.
Yeah.. who knew? Probly heaps of people, but I was today years old before I realised it...