I've been trying to learn what Dissociation is for myself. From what I have learned, there are some experts in dissociation who have studied it from the roots of it's discovery onward, but that it is difficult to assess clinically as it is so subjective, like pain or fatigue, that it is supposedly difficult to measure in individuals. I learned that many Tdocs don't "believe in it" at all. It is seen as a working theory. Freud himself introduced what is now closest to the working hypothesis, and years later, recanted his theory that children faced with CSA and traumas dissociate the memories and use D as a coping skill as a learned response. Many of those who wish to discredit Dissociation as a result of trauma cite Freud's recanting as evidence. This is taking science into the rhetorical realm of semantics, and it is not helpful. In fact, science is not without experimental/researcher bias. It would be nice if PTSD were a problem solved scientifically, but the truth is, we are at the beginning of understanding.
I have seen multiple examples on this forum in which it is assumed that dissociation is a "reaction" or mechanistic coping tool for trauma. In fact, the experts are still trying to find out why those who report PTSD and trauma have high incidents of D. D is more often seen in women. It can be induced without trauma, especially in females, by taking the common antibiotic Minocycline. Minocycline was prescribed for me years ago for acne, and was a popular drug of choice for that then (80's-90's) in the USA. Now it is almost never given to women.
Anyway, most trauma experts see such a strong link between trauma and dissociation that for them, it is a given that one causes the other. I don't disagree, but I wish we had more research to back it all up. For now, it's in the DSM, but that doesn't mean all Tdocs and counselors buy into it. And DID is diagnosed a lot in USA but seems to be culturally understood, viewed, and constructed. Some say it's interagenic, or therapy-induced. Same with "repressed memory" which is it's own hugely contested debate, especially in USA. If you are interested in that, please message me or we can start a thread.
I have seen multiple examples on this forum in which it is assumed that dissociation is a "reaction" or mechanistic coping tool for trauma. In fact, the experts are still trying to find out why those who report PTSD and trauma have high incidents of D. D is more often seen in women. It can be induced without trauma, especially in females, by taking the common antibiotic Minocycline. Minocycline was prescribed for me years ago for acne, and was a popular drug of choice for that then (80's-90's) in the USA. Now it is almost never given to women.
Anyway, most trauma experts see such a strong link between trauma and dissociation that for them, it is a given that one causes the other. I don't disagree, but I wish we had more research to back it all up. For now, it's in the DSM, but that doesn't mean all Tdocs and counselors buy into it. And DID is diagnosed a lot in USA but seems to be culturally understood, viewed, and constructed. Some say it's interagenic, or therapy-induced. Same with "repressed memory" which is it's own hugely contested debate, especially in USA. If you are interested in that, please message me or we can start a thread.