My therapist keeps telling me I have to talk to "my children" (my various traumatic experiences) and let them know that I'm there for them, that I'm not going to abandon them, and that they can trust me. I thought this was kind of silly, initially -- after all, calling them "my children" was just a clever technique for dealing with the trauma, right? Apparently, there's much more to it than this.
I read the following article, from Compton's Encyclopedia, on dissociation. It gives a really good understanding of this as a continuum:
http://www.hiddenhurt.co.uk/dissociation.html
So, between what my therapist seemed to be suggesting, and the information from this article and elsewhere, I'm getting the following picture: that each traumatic instance or period, even if minor, creates it's own little niche within a person's mind, frozen in time at the moment of the trauma. If the trauma is severe enough, this dissociation can result in a completely separate personality, as in those with MPD/DID (Multiple Personality Disorder / Dissociative Identity Disorder). But even when not severe enough to cause such a formal break, she seems to be suggesting that some separation still occurs -- at a lesser level, but enough to have some identity of its own.
If this is accurate (and if I'm interpreting my therapist correctly), this is very important in how we approach treatment for PTSD, because, for childhood trauma, we are *literally* dealing with children when dealing with such trauma -- because, apparently, the mind creates a snapshot of its mental state at the time of the trauma and stores it with (or containing) the traumatic experience. Thus, part of resolving each individual trauma is being able to communicate with the part of the mind harboring the given traumatic experience -- on the level understood within that snapshot.
What are your thoughts on this? Does this resonate with anyone? Or does this just sound like a bunch of bunk?
I read the following article, from Compton's Encyclopedia, on dissociation. It gives a really good understanding of this as a continuum:
http://www.hiddenhurt.co.uk/dissociation.html
So, between what my therapist seemed to be suggesting, and the information from this article and elsewhere, I'm getting the following picture: that each traumatic instance or period, even if minor, creates it's own little niche within a person's mind, frozen in time at the moment of the trauma. If the trauma is severe enough, this dissociation can result in a completely separate personality, as in those with MPD/DID (Multiple Personality Disorder / Dissociative Identity Disorder). But even when not severe enough to cause such a formal break, she seems to be suggesting that some separation still occurs -- at a lesser level, but enough to have some identity of its own.
If this is accurate (and if I'm interpreting my therapist correctly), this is very important in how we approach treatment for PTSD, because, for childhood trauma, we are *literally* dealing with children when dealing with such trauma -- because, apparently, the mind creates a snapshot of its mental state at the time of the trauma and stores it with (or containing) the traumatic experience. Thus, part of resolving each individual trauma is being able to communicate with the part of the mind harboring the given traumatic experience -- on the level understood within that snapshot.
What are your thoughts on this? Does this resonate with anyone? Or does this just sound like a bunch of bunk?