Hello again,
Worried and unhappy. Same therapist, same cognitive behavioral stress testing misfire again this day - and I really don't know what to do. Clearly my therapist subscribes deeply to the validity of cognitive behavioral/adjustment model, and yet it seems an inadequate and patentedly limited approach in relation to what I have difficultly forgetting meshed to the materials that I read. My experiences of trauma prompted me to invest what materials I've consumed, whereas untangling such doesn't strictly seem in the cards.
What am I saying then? Imagine a legacy of socioemotional isolation mixed with a history of emotional abuse and bullying across circumstances. Imagine further that someone such as myself would reach for better written works consistent with developing a textured understanding of various issues rooted in what I'll term activist literature. This would include the review of both historical and contemporary social criticism that would help someone lend reasoned meaning to past suffering, but also heighten sensitivity to matters afloat just about everywhere consistent with being alert and 'involved'.
Lastly, appreciate that for many years indeed I took pride in avidly developing my capacity to apply knowledge gleaned from the study of this topic or that to effectively lend context to very unpleasant traumatic recall. I felt I wasn't alive if I couldn't lend special interpretation to what I experienced, and felt ever greater distance build between myself and others. Affording the reader above a basically undefended critique of myself and my motives, appreciate that my therapist believes that I don't want to change, that my adapation is clearly dysfunctional, and that I resist all efforts to reconsider my impressions and interpretations about much. I'm 'fighting', 'noncooperative', and surely 'resistant'.
The anger does indeed well within me. That normative range experience of much has been afforded to her consistent with being safe, loved, understood, etc. is of course a very good thing for her (how could I contest such?), but please do not judge my perceptions - especially those reinforced and explored in detail for my efforts to read and experiment. I read psychology, but so too do I read sociology, materials that deconstruct and avidly critique the larger socioeconomic context that individual lives unfold within. I further read economics and matters having to do with education in a post-secondary vein. These are further blended with materials that critique trends equating to global economic integration and structural economic change in particular, and much else that simply presents itself in surprising and unsurprising ways. One 'sees' in 7D if you will, noticing context where others flat fail to...
Pretending to voice the unvoiced on the part of my therapist, perhaps stating matters such will ease understanding. Reduced to a few syllables versus my usual torrent of words, perhaps Mike is unhappy because Mike's perceptions are faulty and he should believe in happiness for most others do. I (sic) am relatively happy for I've (sic) found some measure of success and happiness for my orientation and adaptation to the choices and opportunities afforded by life, you haven't, hence I'm (sic) surely correct! End of debate, for can you not detect the clear inadequacies of your fitful adaptation which has patentedly failed?
My retort might go like this. At some point I lost contact with the nontraumatized world and those better insulated from the currents of change for my isolation. I don't know how to get back, and worry that I might never. Pretending that I'm O.K. for doing without (construed however across felt lacks) is almost impossible. Continuing, for my readings the sense of difference between myself and where I perceive so many others to be seems ever starker, whereas it is my conviction that if more individuals read the materials I read, there would be a great deal more texture to 'our' collective relationships, and even for my interpersonal inadequacies, more 'shared' and in a societal sense for embrace/engagement of issues, more involvement and a higher tone overall regarding public discourse, debate, etc.
Summed up in a few words, 'they' would likely be a bit more like myself if 'they' were to undertake the study of some matters that would almost certainly engage all on some level. For long investment I really don't view this as equating to narcissism, but rather an amplification of my basic loneliness affixed atop my trauma legacies. Pursuit of a Ph.D. might draw me closer to 'life', but hard really to hold out for a theoretical circumstance when loneliness and need is ever-present and seemingly inescapable.
Advice to 'not let matters bother me', to 'compartmentalize', to 'hold out', mean very little indeed when some over-filled compartments leak trauma into other compartments (i.e. poor boundaries), whereas compartments that otherwise would allow me to recharge and take stock (the human stuff of social networks, identity and emotional resiliency) are frankly empty and/or unoccupied. This I don't believe she possesses the capability of appreciating. My therapist seems to imagine that for the suffering 'caused' by my searching (however construed), that the logical thing to do is to stop searching and thus 'turn OFF' the suffering in reasoned cognitive/behavioral sense. Understand that I just think this strategy is so limited given I can't 'dump' awareness and have the greatest trouble desensitizing myself to involuntary PTSD triggers and PTSD/amygdala hijacking/recall.
I believe that someone who tends to their own garden exclusively and cannot be strictly bothered to explore in detail macro matters isn't a more compelling person or a better authority for skipping content. In particular, I'm quite frustrated for her belief that her educated perceptions (of one person rooted in what seems one discipline) obviates the need to question the very basis of adjustment therapies. Where is the humanistic and existentialist strain/awareness when it is most needed?
I think I'm heartbroken then - as though years of reading quite good literature at the rate of maybe forty to seventy titles per year has no strict validity by the standards of someone not strictly in the thrall of PTSD and largely invested in one discipline. I think this constitutes the best way I can put it. I don't want to live without my studies, and I really haven't much honest linkage to the nonreading and in particular, the nontraumatized world. Thanks for reading this sprawler of a message. Very sad at present...
M.