• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Sufferer Addicted To Trauma!

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Lost Pup - A little less. As I've stated, I'm not religious, and I have no problem with someone who is, but I don't state some sort of "motto" that I believe in after every one of my posts, and from what I've read other people do not either. I have no problem with someone who says something like, "I will pray for you," or something of that sort. Even though, I am not religious, I can accept that someone else is and they want to pray for me, or they just hope that their God will help me as well. Definitely not a problem. Totally gets weird for me when someone is trying to create a group of people, and then ends almost every statement with religious "quotes". (I know there is a better words for this, but due to my trauma I have a terrible time coming up with the words I'm looking for, and I can not for the life of me think of this one).

I want to reiterate that I am no bashing any one's religion, or saying any religion, or that no religion is best. I wasn't raised with any religion, so I have nothing to say about the matter except for I'm not religious. All I'm trying to get across here is that I see someone trying to get people to follow them into this new way of thinking, and then using religion to make it more appealing. We all know what groups started in that format can grow into, and that's what is creeping me out.
 
At a guess I am thinking Keith may be Haywain and that we also have to open to cultural differences when it comes to concepts of peace and violence.

I too can see the relevance of what Pencil refers to but do also see the limitations and other problems with the way Keith is looking at this. I think the unfortunate part is that peoples responses have been so strong that it doesn't help when getting to the really problematic aspect of this. I can totally understand peoples strong reaction and the thread is very confronting in certain ways. Some of the language etc is going to be pushing red flags for many people. I'm just not sure how useful it is for Keith that all that he believes in is being seen as "bad".

I think there are ways he could keep quite a lot of his way of approaching things if he could acknowledge the limitations and possible dangers and make adjustments for them. I also think he needs to think of how his words will be received here for others with their own difficulties with trauma.
 
Thanks @Abstract, I agree with you. I'm trying to be sure to keep saying things as civil as possible, and also state things like I'm not trying to attack or come at Keith, but like you have said, I'm definitely feeling a very strong response to this thread. So much so, that more than once I have thought I should just stop posting to it, but then seen a new post and it just ignites that flame again.

So again I will say, I'm not trying to say that everything Keith believes in is bad, or that "he" himself is a bad person. I am however getting frustrated with the fact that several people have tried to point out that his use of words is in several ways offensive and very inconsistent with the commonly accepted meanings. Instead of re-wording for anyone, or even trying to explain why he uses the words he does, he just continues posting the same things using the same words, which is either a complete lack of understanding about the matter and problems people are having with his view, regardless of the fact that several have pointed this out for him. Or its that he'd like to deliberately keep saying the same thing in order to elicit more of the same conflict and emotion from others.

I really probably will have to stop posting to and following this thread soon because I don't think there is much more for me to say, especially not nicely, that I haven't already said. I just hope that others stay safe and really research this type of information before they jump into Keith's group he's trying to create. It may be a perfectly good way to help others, but deep down, my instincts (which never work by the way) are screaming at me about this right now. So I would just take that and realize the kind of statement you would be making by agreeing with some of the thinking that has been presented by Keith in this thread.

From what I can see, Keith's theory, and this would be anyone's theory if they agree, is that anyone who feels any strong negative emotion towards anything has been traumatized. You're in a large group of people and feeling overwhelmed = trauma, you're upset by the kids working in a foreign country to make your shoes =trauma, you like to speed/race for the adrenaline rush =trauma. Number two, that any and all of the trauma can and does cause PTSD. Just think about the implications of this...everyone would have PTSD. The thing you've been suffering with for years, working so hard to overcome, would basically become arbitrary because everyone has it. The people who tell you, "just get over it" would essentially become correct about the fact that "you're being too sensitive, and you should just get over it." Number 3 - that anyone who has ever gone back to an abuser or put themself into an abusive situation after the first abuse is by default addicted to this abuse and therefore asking for it, or in his words "attracting it". If you were raped more than once, and/or by more than one abuser essentially you were asking to be raped. If your parent(s) abused you your whole life, you asked for that too.

After being abused by my father for 12 years, I started running away and I ran to another guy who was much older and forced himself on me on my 13th birthday. I continued to be abused by my father continuously until I moved out at 18, and by the other guy continuously for 2 years, and both of them have abused me and still try to contact me since I left. I also slept with more guys than I know after that 2 years of being forced by the first guy, and before I moved out. Probably 90% of these guys were also too old, and therefore also committed crimes when they were with me. I do not call these guys my abusers, because I fail to see it like this as I put myself in those situations, but at the same time I try to remember that those guys also took advantage of a pretty messed up kid who was much too young for them. I would say based on Keith's theory I highly qualify as an "addict to trauma", basically meaning that I wanted to be abused ALL of these times, except for the first time my dad hurt me that I was so young I don't even know when it was. Although I have blamed myself for all of the abuse I've listed, and continue to do so despite being told this is unhealthy and that it is not my fault....I in NO way agree that I was asking for it. I did not go looking for it, I don't even remember how exactly I found all of those guys that took advantage of me. I know I was hungry, cold, and had no where else to go and somehow found myself in these situations whenever even the possibility of having food and/or shelter came up.

Please correct me Keith if I have misunderstood, but this is what I'm getting from all you have said.
 
I honestly don't think Keith has thought about this as deeply as considering other viewpoints/experiences, and I honestly don't think he thought of this site as anything other than a noticeboard.

I don't like what that means for people who have put a great deal of effort and themselves into responses. But I would say that I think the chances are high that others will read them and find them meaningful. I just don't believe this will be Keith.

I do kind of feel the need to say that I don't want a Buddhist blessing chanted at me any more than I want a Christian, Sufi or whatever one. In fact, I find Buddhism and trauma recovery an extremely problematic mix, particularly in terms of ungrounded "spirituality".
 
@Hashi, in fairness, I made a mistake using the word "blessing" which sounds religious. "May all beings be free from suffering" is just sort of a secular reminder of compassion. There is no hidden meaning or larger religious framework attached to it. It does not refer to any god or spirits or anything and so is not really a blessing, per se. Just a statement of hope that people don't suffer, really. I'd say the level of religiosity in on par with something like "do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
 
Last edited:
I absolutely hate when people say they bless me or similar and wouldn't love a blessing of any type (in another religion) even though I wouldn't feel as strongly about it, but am fine with general greetings or wishes which it seems is mostly what Keith uses.

I do worry a lot about some of his ideas and suspect he isn't going to be open to talk through these thing here. I suspect he he had no idea he was going to have this reaction to what he believes and was just posting what he thought without thinking it through.

Samantha, please take care of yourself. Sometimes it's much healthier to walk away. I suspect people often have no intention of harm or even understanding of that harm and are just not very awarely plodding along. That doesn't mean that we don't have a right to our strong feelings but often it's better to just walk away if it is hitting on too much that is painful.
 
I honestly don't think he thought of this site as anything other than a noticeboard
Funnily enough, as I was trying to go through the posts (not successful) I had the image of a faculty notice board. To me Keith's post was something like: 'Mad about XYZ, If you are too, drop in ...' He stated something about himself and was looking for like-minded folks. He never said that others belong in his category. The vehemence of the responses is quite surprising.
 
I suspect people often have no intention of harm or even understanding of that harm and are just not very awarely plodding along.

I think I have reacted so strongly because it seems as though he has given no thought, or at least very little, to the trauma of others and the differences in which people cope with these things. This combined with the comment about everyone being connected, is so contradictory. I agree that he probably meant no harm, as is the circumstance with many people, but I don't feel we should just allow these people to walk around none the wiser, but instead try to help them see the flaws in thinking. I want people to point these out in me, because its the only way I learn about social interactions since I was never taught them. I also don't necessarily think Keith is trying to start some group, but just trying to get the point across that his posts have come across that way.

I'm done have extremely strong comments about this stuff, may still read to see if Keith responds. I think Keith, and everyone, needs to realize though that you can't use comments like the one below, and expect that people will not react strongly.

@Pencil

If you were attracting people who traumatized you that is exactly what I am talking about.that it I a very cunning addiction.

This sounds like extending the category onto everyone, there are other posts as well. I think it was this exact statement that just "flipped the switch" in me. Attracting should never be used as a way to describe how someone got abused.
 
keith Amato said:
one of the things you do is apologize for harms you have caused, I can only speak for myself but in traumatized states I have caused hurt do to reacting to my fear that arises when triggered

Also I do not continue to blame or beat myself up but in truth when I am triggered and am I a disassociated state my thinking becomes skew and. Ann tend to go that way but I am now able to stop the process

keith Amato said:
the point of recovery is to find your power and not be powerless....

That is a very positive message right there. It sounds like you are doing a great job at coping and making changes that feel right for your life. This is a great place to share about struggles and triumphs with having PTSD. Welcome to the forum :)

I am just wondering. Is the 12 step trauma program the only thing you have been to? Did you work through your trauma with a counselor first and then joined the program to deal with repetitive thinking and behaviors? Or do you treat PTSD with both? Ohh, also is the 12 step program that you attend specific to trauma? If so, do they have their own12 steps tailored to trauma?

Have you worked all 12 steps? Are you also a recovering alcoholic?

I am highly interested in learning about this approach. I hope you do not mind all of the questions :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom