Meadowsweet
Diamond Member
I read this some time ago now, but the questions and fears it raised in me are persistent and it bothers me a lot.
The basic story - the partner of a woman who was having therapy due to sexual abuse, was upset because she wasn't fulfilling his need for physical affection (I may be wrong, but I take that to mean sex). He reported that she had tried to reassure him that it wasn't him, that she still loved him, but was struggling with that side of things. So there was nothing to suggest that she was being critical of him sexually. I can empathise with how sad this situation was for both parties. But, what worries me is the attitudes that were some of the opinions that were given.
One was that she was guilty of emotional neglect and abusing him. Another was the notion that she had entered into a contract when she got into the relationship and was failing to fulfill it. It's the last one that I find really frightening.
In relationships I have had sex to pacify and try to avoid retribution for not. But that hasn't always been a conscious decision, it has been a habitual dissociated reaction. That is a big fear for me, because it has the potential to put me at risk. So, I've thought it was me who needs to re-learn a healthier attitude towards sexual relationships and learn to trust that an assertive choice about what somebody can do to my body, will generally be respected by non-abusive men.
I've trusted in that part of my therapy, I don't know about decent, caring men, because I don't have that experience. So I have no choice but to trust. And I feel let down, like I've been sold some ideal about sexual relationships just to make me feel better - but if I ever try to apply what I've learned in the real world, would I just be opening up to those criticisms or abuse?
Is there an unwritten contract that getting into a relationship means giving regular sex (and how often is 'regular' enough?) What is normal in sexual relationships?
The basic story - the partner of a woman who was having therapy due to sexual abuse, was upset because she wasn't fulfilling his need for physical affection (I may be wrong, but I take that to mean sex). He reported that she had tried to reassure him that it wasn't him, that she still loved him, but was struggling with that side of things. So there was nothing to suggest that she was being critical of him sexually. I can empathise with how sad this situation was for both parties. But, what worries me is the attitudes that were some of the opinions that were given.
One was that she was guilty of emotional neglect and abusing him. Another was the notion that she had entered into a contract when she got into the relationship and was failing to fulfill it. It's the last one that I find really frightening.
In relationships I have had sex to pacify and try to avoid retribution for not. But that hasn't always been a conscious decision, it has been a habitual dissociated reaction. That is a big fear for me, because it has the potential to put me at risk. So, I've thought it was me who needs to re-learn a healthier attitude towards sexual relationships and learn to trust that an assertive choice about what somebody can do to my body, will generally be respected by non-abusive men.
I've trusted in that part of my therapy, I don't know about decent, caring men, because I don't have that experience. So I have no choice but to trust. And I feel let down, like I've been sold some ideal about sexual relationships just to make me feel better - but if I ever try to apply what I've learned in the real world, would I just be opening up to those criticisms or abuse?
Is there an unwritten contract that getting into a relationship means giving regular sex (and how often is 'regular' enough?) What is normal in sexual relationships?