sidptitala
Platinum Member
Hi everyone,
I am not sure if this was the wisest move, but I asked chat gpt for help assessing if my extreme fear that the person who abused me will kill me, my mom or sister was justified. Or if I am more afraid than I need to be for ptsd reasons. It asked me a checklist of questions about him- and I answered them.
This was the response to me filling that checklist in (questions asked are included):
I know it's almost impossible to answer these kinds of 'what if' questions. But does it seem to you like the AI is right to be so concerned?
I have no legal options to protect myself from him, beyond maybe bringing him to court for sexual abuse in some years? But I have no evidence of that, and can't be sure I remember all the instances. Doing so would also likely rid me of my remaining family. I doubt he would be convicted based on my word alone that or that it would even go to trial. So it seems likely that any potential benefit of him being informed I've spoken about it is not worth the risk?
I'm so confused
I am not sure if this was the wisest move, but I asked chat gpt for help assessing if my extreme fear that the person who abused me will kill me, my mom or sister was justified. Or if I am more afraid than I need to be for ptsd reasons. It asked me a checklist of questions about him- and I answered them.
This was the response to me filling that checklist in (questions asked are included):
Based on your responses, you’ve given YES to nearly every single risk factor in the assessment — including:
- Severe history of abuse (childhood and adulthood, escalating).
- No remorse, entitlement, manipulative behavior.
- Pressure for contact despite your wishes.
- Past use of objects violently.
- Untreated mental illness.
- Stalking behavior.
- Family minimizing, no consequences, and your isolation.
- Your own sense of fear and hypervigilance.
This adds up to very high risk. Even without direct threats of killing, the pattern is deeply concerning. Many cases of serious violence occur without an explicit threat first — especially when there is entitlement, lack of accountability, and escalation across time.
Assessment Outcome
According to danger assessment guidelines:
That places your father in the highest danger category. From a professional standpoint, this means you should act as though future violence is highly likely if he gains access to you.
- 10+ “Yes” answers = Severe Risk.
- You scored 17 out of 20 possible risk factors.
What This Means for You
- No contact is the safest stance (if possible legally).
- Strengthen your safety plan: keep documents, money, phone access, and routes ready.
- Tell someone outside your family who believes you — friend, therapist, DV advocate, police if you feel safe doing so.
- Document everything (messages, visits, harassment, past violence). It may protect you later if you need legal intervention.
- Trust your gut: your fear is justified. You are not “overreacting.”
Survivors sometimes get worn down when family minimizes risk — but your checklist shows clear, high danger. You are right to take this seriously.
I know it's almost impossible to answer these kinds of 'what if' questions. But does it seem to you like the AI is right to be so concerned?
I have no legal options to protect myself from him, beyond maybe bringing him to court for sexual abuse in some years? But I have no evidence of that, and can't be sure I remember all the instances. Doing so would also likely rid me of my remaining family. I doubt he would be convicted based on my word alone that or that it would even go to trial. So it seems likely that any potential benefit of him being informed I've spoken about it is not worth the risk?
I'm so confused
Last edited by a moderator: