• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Research False Memories Not As Easy To Plant As Touted

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those who are highly suggestible and easily hypnotically induced are more vulnerable to implantation of memories that are not real.

Children fall under both the above categories. But even then, children grow up and reflect and correct false memories or lies told to them, as is mentioned above, if they establish safety and self-compassion.

Unfortunately, not all gaslit, abused kids grow up to be adults living a life consistent or ordered enough to establish a sense of safety within which to heal to the point of accepting their flashbacks or body memories as real memories. They will have to explain them away and remain in the dark.

My poor sister is in this unfortunate state. And it's upsetting to me.

I'm learning to accept this is the way it works, and there's nothing I can do or blame myself for about it; she still has a way of idolizing her abusers, defending them no matter what they do, that can only be described as Stockholm.

She is still financially dependent on our parents, at age 38 and on her second marriage, and feels she has no option other than to submit to the fantasy that they are caring parents, despite it all. The fact they give her enough money to barely survive maintains this illusion.

It's a deal: I give you money and say something almost nice, now and then, and you don't remember anything too nasty.
 
I just now looked at both articles. The one refuting the myth that it's easy to implant false memories is written by a PhD in Clinical and Experimental Psychology.

The second article is written by a freelancer with no expertise at all. This person has no business writing about this topic. Cara has no training to even define the key terms and defend those definitions of which she is writing about.

Loftus' "Studies" are not large enough to be taken seriously. 24 participants with a 30% success rate is not science. Since she quit the APA pending an investigation of two counts of lying under oath, or deliberate withholding of court documents and pergury, her reputation is permanently stained. Nobody should be citing her, yet I see her name used in textbooks on memory. It is proof that you cannot believe everything you read.

I teach college students how to be better readers, and this would be a typical lesson. What is the writer's expertise, education, training, and authority on this particular subject. She might have a PhD but in exercise science or education. That person is not qualified to speak with authority on psychological studies and metastudies they have never read in college, must less written in college or professionally.

I think you will find that any source that is a proponent of False Memory Syndrome is not qualified to make any claim. Loftus herself is a "memory expert" based on doing one paper in college. She is not a traumatic memory expert. Normal memory. Her training involved memory decay within elderly, not abused children.

I truly hate that woman for making millions defending wealthy pedophiles against their daughter's valid accusations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom