I agree, he was. Done skillfully and with respect for the clients (Patient would imply a passive recipient) and fellow therapists, there is plenty of evidence that talking cures can be very effective.
The points being made in the talk on the video, are that
Freud was not respectful of clients or peers,
that his evidence is at best scant, and at worst at least some of it is fabricated, and his effectiveness is highly questionablel.
He also responded to questions, not with logic, argumentation and evidence
but with
ad hominem, smear, shunning, and excommunication from his cult like movement.
The Behaviourists, I think were very much a[n over] reaction to Freud's lack of scientific and logical rigour, and an [imo excessive and scientistic] attempt to apply the model of the physical sciences to the problems that people experience in functioning in their lives and in society. Certainly, people like Aaron Beck Marsha Linehan and many others have done wonderful work within a cognitive behavioural model.
I'd want to keep their valuable work separate from my not very well informed and instinctual dislike for [the evil] B F Skinner.
Arguably, once shorn of their different and wooly jargon names for the same things, all of the talking therapies show a great deal of commonality. Their differences are on the peripheries, the core principals are very similar.