@Emmie420
I don't understand what you mean?
I am here as a result of a drink driver causing several deaths of people around me, as well as nearly killing me as well.
I have anger problems along with the ptsd. I have always had a temper, but it got alot worse after I developed ptsd.
If I were to drive around on the motorways at night looking for people who are drink driving, following them home and assaulting them physically when they step out of their cars.
What would that make me?
- A righteous fighter of the people wronged by societies ills?
- A vigilante able to circumvent the bureaucratic red tape, preventing actual law enforcement from enacting swift brutal justice on those clearly deserving?
Or would it make me?
- A violent psychopath, out hurting people who while not innocent, don't deserve to have their heads bashed in for a stupid choice?
- Someone who uses mental illness as an excuse to harm other's, hurting countless innocent people who have been hurt in horrible ways, by furthering the stigma and misinformation, which paints people who have ptsd as violent lunatics, not people who suffered tragedy and abuse.
You say it is from a place of holier than thou place of judgement, that we have been condemning the actions of this "victim".
In a sense, yes.
No one would have said anything If it didn't serve them, or me, in some way. This is true of everything everyone ever does, always.
Why were we so keen to condemn this person?
I can't speak for others here. Nor do I need to. My reasoning for what I said is this.
Look what I said earlier about being a psychopathic looney, assaulting people who drink drive. I don't do that, because it is wrong. I have never done that. I will never do that. I still know that it is wrong.
I don't have to have done so, to understand why it is wrong.
It is a totally over the top, violent behaviour being enacting on someone to has nothing to do with the person who made me this way in the first place.
This "person\troll" whichever. Is gloating about having taken brutal revenge on a man who committed infidelity. Making him pay for the feelings caused by a totally different man that beat her.
If she had done this to her actual abuser, while still "wrong". This would at least have been a reasonable target.
Don't forget as well this was not done immediately after discovering the infidelity. This was not a moment of sudden anger from being wronged. This was months later. This person went to the man's social media thing, looking for something to rile herself up with. This was not an accidental discovery. She knew she would find images of a distressing nature. Such as images of this man and his "tramp".
There was no need for this.
This is why I condemned her actions.