I'm probably taking this topic far from your original intent......I'm just looking at it from the wider picture. Excuse my rambling brain.
No, please not at all Illusionist. This is a great help. And Friday, thank you as well. I am just trying to get my head around it. Diary has been stalled all day because I am trying to figure this out.
I suppose I am getting the word
role confused here. The best that I can tell, my role, as far as my antagonizers went, was to be the scapegoat. I didn't realize it at the time and wanted to belong to the family in a meaningful way. So I tried to fit myself into familial roles 'the grass cutter', 'the peace maker', 'the wild child', 'the A student'. The role of the scapegoat, however, superseded all so regardless of how I attempted to fill a role that was seen to be a positive addition to the family it was not to be. Until I had my first son.
Then I could do no wrong. My role was 'what a great mother my mother had made of me' as far as I could tell. She died less than a year later.
I think the difference here was that I was never seen as me....but instead as an extension of the antagonizer. I had to be what SHE wanted me to be. She didn't look at me and allow me to grow into myself. I had to grow into Herself. I have to think that there is the difference between a healthy family and a dysfunctional family. The word
role had me confused, because I did feel like I was playing a role.
No idea if this even makes sense. lol. Still rolling it around in my head.