I'm VERY harsh when I argue, but I'm not harsh when I feel things for another. Mommyofomh, I promise that nothing I said was from anger to you or anything that you said. I further promise that I would NEVER try to take pain from you. I have not and never did have any anger toward you: You're in the same place as all the rest of us: Something horrible and beyond what is expected of life happened to you.
I DO understand the pain of it and I'm not in a contest. That's not at all what I was trying to say.
Let me put it this way if it will help:
A dog scratches.
Now, a dog may scratch because it has ticks. A dog may scratch because it has fleas.
The third solution is that a dog scratches because it has ticks and fleas.
My argument is NEVER against the people on this forum: We are ALL trying to find a solution to this PTSD, OR trauma thing.
Instead, it's about the confusion and misinformation that happens when we're all trying to figure out the difference (on the internet with our peers) between trauma, Bi-Polar, PTSD... etc.
Mommyofomh, You suffered a LOT of SHIT. You suffered what nobody should suffer. Other people have ALSO suffered on this post and I would NEVER question that you suffered it.
The question I've had on this post and others is the difference between a very real trauma and pain and grief on one hand and PTSD on the other.
I promise that I'm a gentle man in dealing with any one persons' experience of trauma and cannot help myself but to try to be there FOR that person. PTSD is NOT about trauma, though it's caused by trauma. That doesn't mean that a person experiences LESS pain for their experiences than anybody that experiences PTSD. Instead, it means that they are dealing with a different issue... something that can be helped by dealing with the REAL issue of the traumatic event rather than the "ghosts" of the traumatic event that PTSD people have to deal with.
I PROMISE that I'm very bad and suck at most social interactions and that I will sometimes argue "facts" without any consideration for feelings. It's a personality type that I'm still trying to work on. That said, though, I very much DO care about the feelings of people on this forum and in this post.
I apologize for anything I said that would make you NOT feel welcome and supported. You are and I DO feel for you and I, like everyone else, is there.
-------
Side note to Amethyst on the use of caps. I've been on the Internet long before there was a World Wide Web. With ALL respect toward you that this is your site and that you're a moderator on a private site on which I have no rights, may I submit that the tradition of the web, forums and posts allow for the use of caps in some circumstances, but condemns it in others?
The use of caps as a way to "yell or scream" has always been looked down upon. There is NOTHING more noxious than a person that rants with their caps lock on and their understanding of a paragraph off.
That said, the tradition of the Internet is that a "word" may be made more important in five ways: Italic, Bold/Strong, CAPS, Underlined, or Blinking. This does NOT include Header styles and the simple act of making a font LARGER.
While your editor allows for the bolding of text, the fact is that a lot of users don't have that option: CAPS of a single word is traditional: It establishes a lot of meaning that can be otherwise lost in the Internet.
My use of caps has NEVER been used in a noxious manner and, though I may be noxious in person, have never used that new, Internet grammar as a way to extend an expletive: I never used caps to scream or yell.
I'd submit that you allow caps when it's NOT a paragraph of screaming or even a sentence or ANY instance of "screaming and yelling" anything. Instead, that it's allowed when a person is trying to make ONE word the most important in a sentence. Caps, in this case, become the verbal and oral equivalent of STRESSING a word with a pound of a fist against a table.