spinningmytires
Confident
This might be of interest to only those struggling with a reading and writing disability, like myself. My thoughts on this topic aren’t easy to explain though I’ll try. Recently I noticed when reading my old cursive hand-written notes that my cursive writing was much easier to read than printed text. But why?
During my mid 30’s, I was diagnosed with a reading disability in forming (word) associations. Yet I’ve always struggled with word substitutions and with finding words when reading and writing though rarely when speaking. Since childhood, something has consistently slowed my reading speed which has never advanced beyond that of an 8 year old child.
Cursive writing often adds an upward curving stroke or hook at the end of most words while printed text only ends words with an empty space. This might be an oversimplification, but would seeing the upward curving stroke at the end of most cursive words be signaling my brain to stop generating new word substitutions and associations and simply move onto the next word.
Am I ignoring the empty spaces used within printed text - because when I view the printed word “the”, for example, I might read it as “then” or “there” or “their” or “these.” I’ll generate additional letters that aren’t there. Or I’ll only read half of the word while ignoring the remainder .. it only gets more complicated.
Beyond this difficulty of adding additional letters or omitting them, I will also unknowingly generate new word associations, for example - if the printed word is “more” my brain might unknowingly substitute the word “most’ or “much” or “many.” When reading the word “later” my brain might substitute the word “after.” My word substitutions are so burdensome and confusing that, I sometime lose sight of the original meaning. Worse case scenario, my mind will go blank, as it’s just too overwhelming.
I suspect that when writing down cursive words onto a sheet of paper, I’m processing some of the word’s meaning during the process of actually writing it down. For example, I generally sub-divide my cursive words into smaller abstracted parts, such as, the prefix or suffix. Here these abstracted scribbles can take on their own identity, as if, I were using a personalized short-hand.
These personalized abstractions are absent in the printed text. I’m guessing that, when I use cursive hand-writing I might also be streamlining my future reading task.
It seems to be much easier for me to comprehend the prefix and suffix of an abstracted and stylized cursive word. Conventional printed text disallows such abstractions and linking of letters. The printed text’s extreme uniformity and isolation of every letter disallows these variations.
Perhaps, my scribbled and abstracted suffix might represent the word’s ending, just as, the cursive end stroke provides the word’s ending.
Though I had neatly hand-printed art book notes onto paper, decades ago, using only capital letters, those notes are very difficult to read - perhaps because every letter maintained its uniformity in size, shape and distance while all were missing the cursive end stroke.
I would suspect that, if given a vertical list of single words using printed text and then, having made a copy of this same word list using my own cursive hand-writing that, my cursive word list would be far easier to read with fewer word substitutions than the printed text version.
Reading difficulties are a complex subject and so, I hope my post doesn’t come across as suggesting there might be a simple fix …there isn’t. There are, however, printed font styles available that simulate cursive writing. Perhaps these fonts might be of some help to those struggling with reading difficulties. I only know that my own cursive hand-writing is easier for me to read than printed text.
During my mid 30’s, I was diagnosed with a reading disability in forming (word) associations. Yet I’ve always struggled with word substitutions and with finding words when reading and writing though rarely when speaking. Since childhood, something has consistently slowed my reading speed which has never advanced beyond that of an 8 year old child.
Cursive writing often adds an upward curving stroke or hook at the end of most words while printed text only ends words with an empty space. This might be an oversimplification, but would seeing the upward curving stroke at the end of most cursive words be signaling my brain to stop generating new word substitutions and associations and simply move onto the next word.
Am I ignoring the empty spaces used within printed text - because when I view the printed word “the”, for example, I might read it as “then” or “there” or “their” or “these.” I’ll generate additional letters that aren’t there. Or I’ll only read half of the word while ignoring the remainder .. it only gets more complicated.
Beyond this difficulty of adding additional letters or omitting them, I will also unknowingly generate new word associations, for example - if the printed word is “more” my brain might unknowingly substitute the word “most’ or “much” or “many.” When reading the word “later” my brain might substitute the word “after.” My word substitutions are so burdensome and confusing that, I sometime lose sight of the original meaning. Worse case scenario, my mind will go blank, as it’s just too overwhelming.
I suspect that when writing down cursive words onto a sheet of paper, I’m processing some of the word’s meaning during the process of actually writing it down. For example, I generally sub-divide my cursive words into smaller abstracted parts, such as, the prefix or suffix. Here these abstracted scribbles can take on their own identity, as if, I were using a personalized short-hand.
These personalized abstractions are absent in the printed text. I’m guessing that, when I use cursive hand-writing I might also be streamlining my future reading task.
It seems to be much easier for me to comprehend the prefix and suffix of an abstracted and stylized cursive word. Conventional printed text disallows such abstractions and linking of letters. The printed text’s extreme uniformity and isolation of every letter disallows these variations.
Perhaps, my scribbled and abstracted suffix might represent the word’s ending, just as, the cursive end stroke provides the word’s ending.
Though I had neatly hand-printed art book notes onto paper, decades ago, using only capital letters, those notes are very difficult to read - perhaps because every letter maintained its uniformity in size, shape and distance while all were missing the cursive end stroke.
I would suspect that, if given a vertical list of single words using printed text and then, having made a copy of this same word list using my own cursive hand-writing that, my cursive word list would be far easier to read with fewer word substitutions than the printed text version.
Reading difficulties are a complex subject and so, I hope my post doesn’t come across as suggesting there might be a simple fix …there isn’t. There are, however, printed font styles available that simulate cursive writing. Perhaps these fonts might be of some help to those struggling with reading difficulties. I only know that my own cursive hand-writing is easier for me to read than printed text.