I'd like to just say again, I'm not a native English speaker, so discussing things like this can lead to misunderstandings as words can have connotations all of which I may not aware of. Just saying. Please feel free to ask anything for clarification with regard to what I write here. :)
Over empathising with others whilst loosing touch with or not considering our own feelings and needs. That could be CD (codependency), Stockholm
This is were I see a fine line between CD and Stockholm. I have no experience with caretaking in the sense I think you refer to for this thread. I do think that what you wrote, @
Abstract, does apply to CD, but I think not for Stockholm in my experience and of how I have viewed Stockholm. My own Stockholm has me lose my self. I "literally" vanish. I do not only lose touch with my own feelings and needs, I become a different person, yet not in the sense of DID (Dissociative Identity Disorder). I feel I go into survival mode, which has my self lock up in my most inner core, some sort of solid steel safe that is hidden very, very deep inside of me. Even if someone came and found the key to the first door, there would be a million more doors they'd have to find the respective keys for to make their way to the room that solid steel safe is in. My self is locked away so effectively, that, to me, "losing touch with or not considering our own feelings and needs" is saying way too little. Even if I wanted to get in touch with or consider my own feelings and needs, I would NOT be ABLE to when in Stockholm mode. It maybe is a bit like locking my self away so much and ensuring the safety of the solid steel safe by not even telling myself how to find the way back to that room the safe is in. It's a little bit like the search for the Holy Grail in the movie The DaVinci Code...
Not being able to feel OK if those around us are not - absorbing others feelings.
The first part ("not being able to feel OK if those around us are not") I can see as a CD thing, the second part ("absorbing others feelings") I have a hard time seeing as a CD thing. I think, up to a certain extent, it may well be part of CD, or can be, but I think from a certain extent, it would go as Stockholm for me.
In the first part, I can see a person not losing their self. In the second part I can though, see a person losing their self. I mean their whole self, not just a part of their self. For me, I feel and think I have never lost my whole self in CD, but in Stockholm. I think there is a fine line, or may be, or I may well just be wrong.
Just trying to find more clarity...
like what if someone needs help, do you have to wait for them to ask? Can you never offer?
What kacee said. Plus, I think you can also just "help" without wording it as such. Example: The guy I've been seeing has anxiety on public transport. So I just take over in the sense that I will see to him or us leaving the house on time, buy the ticket, let him choose to sit where he wants, because my anxiety on public transport is A LOT less. I can have high levels of anxiety in other circumstances/situations and it is when he takes over and ensures I am feeling okay, not get under pressure, etc. We've been mindful of one another. Reason I'm saying this: there's a fine line you have to be mindful about as well. Which leads me to:
Codependency, and, I assume, Caretaking: Being too mindful of the other, i.e. losing sight of yourself.
I think it is necessary to be mindful of you WHILE being mindful of the other.