Looking through proposals for yet another set of changes to British gun laws (they've been amended on average every eighteen months, since 1968!)
There's a proposal to allow prosecution for having the means to make something into a firearm.
This is the logical extension of gun control. Back I the late 1990s a British person who was sick of arguing that guns aren't difficult to make from scratch, set out to demonstrate that they aren't difficult to make.
He made, test fired and wrote up a submachine gun! Which apparently is one of the easiest guns to make.
He used only simple household tools like a hacksaw a hand drill and a little welder. The steel was all readily available standard sizes. The book is published by palladin.
He was punished heavily, first by five years in a high security prison with hardened criminals it was his first" offence" and he was no risk to anyone or anything other than the threat he posted to the illusion that guns can be banned.
Later, he was disappeared for three months by police without his relatives or anyone else being informed of his whereabouts. Britain is a signatory to a UN declaration, which condemns such disappearances as crimes against humanity. So much for fine intentions. when someone shows bureaucrats claims to be false, The British state can behave in just as criminal a manner as Ceacescu's or Pinochet's secret police.
Following the gentleman's first arrest. Enquiries were made about the possibility/ feasibility of requiring licenses for home workshops. People who make model trains and the like.
It seems that something like that is now being proposed
Remembering that only basic tools were used. At the most basic, a hacksaw and a hand drill. It looks like a step towards universal criminalisation.
The process is something like the old lady who swallowed a fly, and her ever more drastic efforts to overcome the problems caused by each attempt to remedy the new and worse problems caused by the previous treatment.
She ended up swallowing a horse. She's dead, of course.
There's a proposal to allow prosecution for having the means to make something into a firearm.
This is the logical extension of gun control. Back I the late 1990s a British person who was sick of arguing that guns aren't difficult to make from scratch, set out to demonstrate that they aren't difficult to make.
He made, test fired and wrote up a submachine gun! Which apparently is one of the easiest guns to make.
He used only simple household tools like a hacksaw a hand drill and a little welder. The steel was all readily available standard sizes. The book is published by palladin.
He was punished heavily, first by five years in a high security prison with hardened criminals it was his first" offence" and he was no risk to anyone or anything other than the threat he posted to the illusion that guns can be banned.
Later, he was disappeared for three months by police without his relatives or anyone else being informed of his whereabouts. Britain is a signatory to a UN declaration, which condemns such disappearances as crimes against humanity. So much for fine intentions. when someone shows bureaucrats claims to be false, The British state can behave in just as criminal a manner as Ceacescu's or Pinochet's secret police.
Following the gentleman's first arrest. Enquiries were made about the possibility/ feasibility of requiring licenses for home workshops. People who make model trains and the like.
It seems that something like that is now being proposed
Remembering that only basic tools were used. At the most basic, a hacksaw and a hand drill. It looks like a step towards universal criminalisation.
The process is something like the old lady who swallowed a fly, and her ever more drastic efforts to overcome the problems caused by each attempt to remedy the new and worse problems caused by the previous treatment.
She ended up swallowing a horse. She's dead, of course.
