Veggies have long been involved in political drama! Lol. Farmers markets actually have a the right to block city streets to occur because of the same constitutional principles that allow protests to occur. Some were attually started in the 1950s in order to stop folks who were cruising down the stress and racing... sadly, gathering to sell veggies has never been free of politics.
On a personal level, I totally get the outrage and distress. I rather have a farmers market in my own city than mass protest against Marxism any day. But that's my personal preference.
The US constitution protects the right of the "people peaceably to assemble." (
First Amendment). To sell veggies or express an opinion.
But not riot.
Our Supreme Court has long held that even the KKK have the right to march in the streets --- but not to light fires or kill people.
What I will write next, is to explain some of the thinking behind protests from groups on the right - it is NOT a statement of agreement.
There is a battle happening in the Democrat party in California about those who want to turn to socialist systems or not. From a left leaning media source:
Link Removed
Marxism is complex, but in a nutshell, it's a brand of socialism and most every day folks on the right understand just this about it: "Marxism is the system of socialism of which the dominant feature is public ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange." (
What is Marxism)
For some people on the right, they see calls for single payer healthcare (which is happening in numerous states) as government control of the means of production, distribution, and exchange, of the healthcare industry. They know most people in the US agree Marxism is bad... so for some, they feel it's time to say "no Marxism." (Is single payer healthcare *actually* Marxist? Not necessarily.)
In my own area, I've had huge protests go right by my apartment -- the women's march and others for and against Trump and various causes. Do the protests mean to provoke? Well, I think most people who march do want to provoke thought and change. Why else march?
A few, on both sides, want to provoke violence and that's not protected speech. That's wrong.
It stinks to have to deal with such marches, and they trigger my symptoms too - but I rather find places to get away from the crowds and etc, than to take away the right to peaceably assemble, no matter how provoking the topic. A cause can actually lose support when it disrupts too much. It can also gain a lot of support when it's peaceful. MLK Jr knew that the marches he lead (which also shut down city streets) HAD to be non-violent because they would be televised and photographed and if the American people saw violence against *peaceful* protesters, it would help persuade the American people to finally support change and passing the Civil Rights Act.
When the women's march against Trump happened this year, I knew of trump supporters who threatened to run them over claiming that it was delaying ambulances from getting to hospitals.
Running people over is murder or attempted murder and absolutely wrong.
I'll agree that protests that shut down highways and city events, even long held farmers markets, is concerning. Anything that puts life in danger goes over the line.
The constitution doesn't allow us to block a protest or assembly based on the ideas of the group.
When people no longer feel as though they can be heard through peaceful means, they don't disappear. They get violent. The constitution does not protect violence. It does protect people assembling and marching for whatever crazy idea they want to express.