D
Deleted member 45988
There was so much wrong with the Michael Jackson situation I’d not know where to start - any adult wh...
Ok, I agree that beloved auntie and showing new toy is entirely different from Michael Jackson and is not risky.
The original post from @littleoc included the phrase: "How can you tell danger from opportunity, or blessing from temptation by an evil person." I suspect original post was referring to a situation somehow inbetween beloved and trusted auntie and Michael Jackson, but somehow it seems to me that a Michael Jackson fits this because letting a child hang out with rich, fairly brilliant famous person who might even do things like pay medical bills might provide opportunity and maybe be sort of a blessing or it might be danger and temptation from an evil person. Like I feel this applies less to trusted auntie who might go upstairs to look at a new toy, because it's not unlikely to be much of a gamble to allow this. Again, though, i don't think original poster was talking about something as potentially risky as Michael Jackson, just explaining why I brought him up. I think that there isn't necessarily much disagreement on this thread, but possibly slight misunderstandings in what each other are referring to.
@Sideways stated: "Dealing with a person with serious pathology of any kind on the other hand? Probably not a great idea to give them sleep-over privileges"
I was sort of surprised to find out that Michael Jackson actually had the skin disorder he said he had giving him white areas (autopsy report states this). Also, his children seem to be sticking by him not being a child molestor. Jackson isn't really a very good example to talk about whether behavior is grooming or not, but then maybe he is because he was so strange he seemed like a pedophile who was maybe grooming boys, but maybe he actually wasn't.
Last edited by a moderator: