Justmehere
Sponsor
.
What Katie teaches is a form of meta cognition: learning to think about our thinking. CBT, DBT, and many forms of trauma therapy explore this too - which is part of why it will work to some degree.
While she teaches how to think about thinking, the problem is that she takes a distrust of thoughts too far. Just like changing thoughts plays a role in broken bone healing, the bone is still broken and needs to heal, no matter how much I think otherwise.
Check out this article for a better explanation of how Katie Bryon takes CBT principals too far. http://mortentolboll.weebly.com/a-c...e-and-her-therapeutic-technique-the-work.html She has even described how the burning of babies by Nazi's was the love of God, and the mothers simply needed to change their thoughts to avoid suffering. No joke.
I could share so many other examples...
I personally would steer clear of the works of Katie Bryon. It's popular in my area and it has left a number of people worse off than when they started simply because she takes a wonderful and sound idea a bit too far.
I find myself very concerned at how the vast majority of the group and techniques and workshops have many cult like or flat out cult-ish qualities. I even went with a friend to one and had to leave because it was so unhealthy. She tries to administer good CBT techniques, but in a way that is dangerous.
That doesn't mean there are no good elements to her work, but instead, like all dangerous groups, there are good elements to it. Those elements that are good can be pursued without all the dangers.
Actually what Katie proposes is different than Christianity. They do share the similarity that "salvation" is by definition not earned but given through grace. However, mainstream Christianity focuses on the person of Christ (thus the name of Christianity) and I don't see the same focus in the Katie Bryon teachings. It's more focused on self and general consciousness and a very different take on God than what Christ or mainstream Christians teach. If someone wants to pursue that kind of salvation, then I don't judge them at all for doing so. However, I think it's important to be clear that Katie Bryon's "The Work" it's not the same as mainstream Christian belief. In fact, in healthy Christian belief, (and in healthy CBT techniques), and the teachings of Christ himself, there is a practice of embracing of grief as one of the paths to find comfort and healing and relief. There is also a heavy emphasis on personal sacrifice. Compassion for others is at a cost but can be fit both. Katie Bryon's methods go against that. She also sees personal happiness as the way to solve most of the world's problems. Of course personal happiness is a great thing, but it's not the end all be all. Sometimes grief is a part of the process of healing. Christ taught that belief in him and taking up his yoke and one's own cross was the solution. Very different things.what Katie is saying is the same as Christianity, which is that we cannot earn salvation by good works, we simply received it by grace. If a person could achieve enlightenment then surely it is their ego that has achieved it?
What Katie teaches is a form of meta cognition: learning to think about our thinking. CBT, DBT, and many forms of trauma therapy explore this too - which is part of why it will work to some degree.
While she teaches how to think about thinking, the problem is that she takes a distrust of thoughts too far. Just like changing thoughts plays a role in broken bone healing, the bone is still broken and needs to heal, no matter how much I think otherwise.
Check out this article for a better explanation of how Katie Bryon takes CBT principals too far. http://mortentolboll.weebly.com/a-c...e-and-her-therapeutic-technique-the-work.html She has even described how the burning of babies by Nazi's was the love of God, and the mothers simply needed to change their thoughts to avoid suffering. No joke.
I could share so many other examples...
I personally would steer clear of the works of Katie Bryon. It's popular in my area and it has left a number of people worse off than when they started simply because she takes a wonderful and sound idea a bit too far.
I find myself very concerned at how the vast majority of the group and techniques and workshops have many cult like or flat out cult-ish qualities. I even went with a friend to one and had to leave because it was so unhealthy. She tries to administer good CBT techniques, but in a way that is dangerous.
That doesn't mean there are no good elements to her work, but instead, like all dangerous groups, there are good elements to it. Those elements that are good can be pursued without all the dangers.